Thread Number: 51686
Anyone bought a Speed Queen lately?
[Down to Last]

automaticwasher.org's exclusive eBay Watch:
scroll >>> for more items --- [As an eBay Partner, eBay may compensate automaticwasher.org if you make a purchase using any link to eBay on this page]
Post# 740781   3/9/2014 at 19:02 (3,700 days old) by suziboyer ()        

I am looking for a good top loading washer and am leaning towards a Speed Queen AWN542. Has anyone bought only lately? ARe they still having a grease/rust problem or is that fixed?
Just checking as this is a lot of money for me to spend and I need a good washer.
If you have other recommendations, please let me know. Our local appliance dealer sells these for $899.

Thanks!





Post# 740785 , Reply# 1   3/9/2014 at 19:17 (3,700 days old) by washman (o)        

Yes I have one and so does my father. I got mine 8/29/2013 and have had nothing but positive results from it. My laundry comes clean in the Speed Queen.

I cannot comment on the grease issue; perhaps I was lucky. Not so sure about the rust issue if there ever was one.

This machine is the last of the old school top loaders that actually use a fair amount of water to get the job done. You get tap hot for hot wash; warm is dumbed down quite a bit however.

If you get one now, the warranty on the transmission is increased to 15 years vs 10.

I have put a link to my machine in action. This particular load was quite heavy as it was all cotton towels but as you can see, the Speed Queen really carried the freight.

One caveat is the water level. It will NOT fill to the top row of holes. You can either hold down the fill knob to "reset" and it will fill that way OR you can search youtube for how to adjust the water level so large is truly large.

Others on this forum have discovered the joys of owning an old school machine. Check Amazon.com for reviews and other sites. You will find them to be overwhelmingly positive.

I'll be glad to answer any questions you may have.


CLICK HERE TO GO TO washman's LINK


Post# 740790 , Reply# 2   3/9/2014 at 19:46 (3,700 days old) by alineber ()        
Agree with washman 100%

I bought my set in 2012. Before I washed clothes in it, I did an empty wash with hot water, 2 cups of Tide detergent and 2 cups of STPP. After the washer was through, there was no greasy film on the tub. It is the best washer out there. My 64 year old Mother was so impressed with mine, that she bought one last year. She has fallen in love with it and plans to buy the matching dryer this year.

STPP can be bought at Home Depot or Lowes. Make sure it is the true phosphate kind. The box color will be white and red.

I have never heard of any rust problems, nor does mine or my mothers have any rust.

Good Luck!


Post# 740794 , Reply# 3   3/9/2014 at 20:38 (3,700 days old) by mtn1584 (USA)        
Buy it.................

My AWN542 is going on five years strong, my mother has one and so does my brother.
My brother within the last few months..no grease issues.
Mike


Post# 740815 , Reply# 4   3/9/2014 at 21:27 (3,700 days old) by imperial70 (MA USA)        

I bought one (AWN542) in the summer of 2013.
It has become my daily driver but here are some caveats.

- The warm water setting is a joke if you live in a cold climate during the winter. The water comes out cool at best.

- I did have to wipe out the polishing compound that was left behind.

- The timer is very cheap. Not like the positive feeling that Whirlpool/Kenmore offered.

- It is a huge water hog. If you don't have any worries about that then this is a non-issue.

- I can tell it's going to eat belts. I don't do any heavy loads and there is belt dust all over the bottom of the unit. I really should order a spare belt.

- The hole design in the tub does not suck water through them during the spin cycle. When the machine completes there is visible moisture on the walls and floor of the tub.


Good points:

- Cleans really well.
- Rinses excellent.
- Extremely quiet.
- I have never experienced an out of balance issue.


Post# 740843 , Reply# 5   3/10/2014 at 02:21 (3,700 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

Are you sure that you can buy STPP at Home Depot or Lowes? All I have ever seen there is TSP and that's not the same. Usually to get STPP you have to mail order it.

Post# 740854 , Reply# 6   3/10/2014 at 05:48 (3,699 days old) by alineber ()        
whirlcool

You are correct it's TSP that Home Depot and Lowes sells. The STPP, I have, was ordered from soapgoods.com.

Thanks for catching that mistake.

Allen


Post# 740862 , Reply# 7   3/10/2014 at 06:20 (3,699 days old) by suziboyer ()        

Thank you all so much! I prefer the old school washers and am disgusted with the Maytag Performa that came with this house and keeps breaking. Today I'm going to my local appliance store and order the Speed Queen.

Hey Washman, thanks for the Youtube video.

I have researched how to defeat the lid lock and how to fix the water level issue. I might also drill out the hot water line to make my warm wash actually warm. I use warm washes quite a bit.


Post# 740869 , Reply# 8   3/10/2014 at 07:17 (3,699 days old) by mrb627 (Buford, GA)        
It is a huge water hog.

mrb627's profile picture
Compared to other top loaders that this machine is fashioned after, the Speed Queen is quite water efficient in my opinion.

Malcolm


Post# 740875 , Reply# 9   3/10/2014 at 08:07 (3,699 days old) by alineber ()        
Huge water hog?????

Considering that the machine has a water level control knob, that allows you to choose any amount of water you want, I would not go so far as to call it a "Huge Water Hog". I might of said "Larger Water Volume Per Clothing". In my opinion, the words "Huge" and "Hog" are reserved for those few extreme or over the top cases.

I have to agree with Malcolm's statement aslo.

Allen


Post# 740882 , Reply# 10   3/10/2014 at 08:45 (3,699 days old) by kenmoreguy89 (Valenza Piemonte, Italy- Soon to be US immigrant.)        

kenmoreguy89's profile picture
Go safely for a good topload washer ie real washer and of course Speed Queen , you already opted yourself for the top available today, it surely is the only modern brand able to give real clean result and reliability!
And it is MADE IN USA!
otherwise there is always vintage market....but if you want a brand new one, go speed queen for sure!
here is my suggestion.




This post was last edited 03/10/2014 at 09:53
Post# 740888 , Reply# 11   3/10/2014 at 09:47 (3,699 days old) by washman (o)        
Believe me when I tell you suziboyer

You will not regret your purchase of a Speed Queen.

Post# 740919 , Reply# 12   3/10/2014 at 14:21 (3,699 days old) by DigAPony ()        

Here is a matched set, only $100 more over the dealer's price for the washer alone, not to mention sales tax and perhaps a delivery fee.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Speed-Queen-AWN4...



Post# 740927 , Reply# 13   3/10/2014 at 14:42 (3,699 days old) by mrb627 (Buford, GA)        
Hmmm...

mrb627's profile picture
Wonder what purchased by mistake means?

Malcolm


Post# 740994 , Reply# 14   3/10/2014 at 18:22 (3,699 days old) by mtn1584 (USA)        
WOW

GOOD DEAL, NOT FAR FROM ME EITHER! WTH??? HOW DO YOU MAKE A $1700 MISTAKE??
MIKE


Post# 741018 , Reply# 15   3/10/2014 at 20:12 (3,699 days old) by angus (Fairfield, CT.)        

I have had my Speed Queen toploader since 2006 and am quite happy with it. Only issues I had were replacing a belt (which the repairman tells me is something you will have to do every 5 years or so). No big deal. And my timer went but more likely was due to a bad outlet which was evidenced from the fried plug that the repairman showed me when he came to replace the timer. (the plug was behind the dryer and not readily visible).

My unit AWS75N was one of the last with a warm rinse option and fills to the top row of holes. Hope to keep it for a long time...


Post# 741339 , Reply# 16   3/12/2014 at 13:21 (3,697 days old) by gardenmom ()        
I love mine!

I got a speedqueen about two years ago after going thru two Maytag transmissions in a six-month period right after the factory warranty expired - and only after paying for two new transmissions did Maytag finally fix the design of the faulty transmission. I love my speedqueen - I have no idea what problems anyone refers to in a speedqueen - as there are three of us in a very very small town that purchased them recently with no problems - which is good, because living 30 miles from the nearest appliance store or repairmen makes for very expensive repair bills. My daughter did laundry at my house on occasion and when her older machine failed about 6 months ago - she bought one too. She lives in the country and has rural water and hasn't noticed any increase in the water bill and neither did I. I think I'm helping the local mom/pop appliance store in the area who sell Speedqueens, as I always recommend them if I hear someone needs a reliable washer. My co-worker had been waiting for two weeks for a washer delivery from a major department/appliance store and she finally called them up and asked for her money back - went to the mom/pop shop bought a speedqueen and he delivered it and hooked it up for her the very next day - on a Saturday even! You can't go wrong with a Speedqueen.



Post# 741363 , Reply# 17   3/12/2014 at 14:47 (3,697 days old) by chetlaham (United States)        
LOVE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

chetlaham's profile picture

I think you will to. I bought on a few months ago and so far it has out performed my expectations of a modern top loader. Its very smooth running and everything comes out exceptionally clean. For the power they have the agitator is surprisingly delicate. I notice far less linting in the dryer, comparable actually to that of a Maytag helical washer. Nothing gets torn or snagged like with the Dual action agitator in the Direct drive.

 

I did not notice any grease or rough spots when the machine was delivered. There is a weld seam in the tub, but was smooth in mine. Being honest the machine on the sales floor was a different story, the weld in the tub was very rough, but it was an earlier made machine since it has been sitting on the sales floor for 2 years now.

 

I do agree that some water gets trapped in the upper lip of the spin basket that comes down when the spinning stops, but IMO its a small amount. I haven't had issues in mine with it. The spin drain pushes the clothes gently and evenly up against the tub, so they come out better than all scrunched up in the DD. Im glad I gave away the DD, DD never have been top performers in my mind. Not awful, but they just don't come close to a Speed Queen.

 

The timer as a whole is not cheap in my opinion. The know does have a rickety feel to it, however, behind it is a very good quality mechanical timer with a really good terminal connector block. The timer is no joke I will say that, its very similar in design to what the washers had 15 years ago before they went with those infamous plastic case timers. The timer itself also turns and has sharp clean electrical contact clicks while advancing, no lazy or slow switching. No sputtering of the motor coming on or shutting down like with some plastic case timer machines Ive used.

 

The belt does leave a lot of shavings in the cabinet, a lot in my machine. However, I noticed mine had a Goodyear belt, which I would think is a quality belt over the no name Chinese belts. Even if the belt does burn up or become weak, its easy to change. Id rather the belt be the weak link then the transmission.

 

So far Im in love with what I using, and this comes from a harsh washer critic LOL. Buy now before its to late.  Im glad I did. :D    


Post# 741416 , Reply# 18   3/12/2014 at 17:28 (3,697 days old) by Imperial70 (MA USA)        

Those of you that picked up on my water hog statement: I noticed you didn't have anything to comment on about my other caveats. Interesting. :-)

Like I said, I am using it which means I like it. I was just pointing out it's not going to use 12 gallons of water per cycle.

Turn down the water level? Are you kidding. With a full load of clothes you can't reduce the water level. It needs to use the 30+ gallons of water. It is what it is, uses generous amounts of water to get done what a front loader does with much less water.


Post# 741422 , Reply# 19   3/12/2014 at 17:45 (3,697 days old) by DigAPony ()        

Here is another CL Speed Queen washer, very reasonable price and this model shouldn't need the water level adjustment.

newyork.craigslist.org/que/app/43...

I'll place this in the Shopper Square section as well.


Post# 741429 , Reply# 20   3/12/2014 at 17:56 (3,697 days old) by washman (o)        
You're correct imperial70 so I will comment on some of

"The warm water setting is a joke if you live in a cold climate during the winter. The water comes out cool at best."----I agree. In fact, I am researching a workaround on this so I don't have to start hot fill then move to warm to get an actual warm wash.

"I did have to wipe out the polishing compound that was left behind"---I did not have this problem nor did my dad.

"The timer is very cheap. Not like the positive feeling that Whirlpool/Kenmore offered"-----I can't compare to a WK machine but I don't see any less cheapness than compared to the GE Profile I used to own.

"It is a huge water hog. If you don't have any worries about that then this is a non-issue"----No more so than the GE it replaced (a 1999 unit from Monkey Wards). But it cleans well so if it. I want my laundry clean, not done in a way that fits a bureaucrat's agenda.

" I can tell it's going to eat belts. I don't do any heavy loads and there is belt dust all over the bottom of the unit. I really should order a spare belt. " -----Can't say, I have yet to pull the front off to have a look. But if what you say is true, then I will get a spare belt too.

"The hole design in the tub does not suck water through them during the spin cycle. When the machine completes there is visible moisture on the walls and floor of the tub"----Agreed. And guess what, same thing with the GE. Even worse in the GE if it had to deal with a moderately unbalanced load and it was a neutral drain machine too. I notice no more wetness in the clothes than I did with the GE.


Post# 741443 , Reply# 21   3/12/2014 at 18:31 (3,697 days old) by alineber ()        
Just wanted to clarify my statements

"Turn down the water level? Are you kidding. With a full load of clothes you can't reduce the water level. It needs to use the 30+ gallons of water. It is what it is, uses generous amounts of water to get done what a front loader does with much less water."

Considering that many people are having to rewash clothes two or three times in these front loaders, I would not say that front loaders do the same job as the Speed Queen top loader can with less water.

If you are the type that sits in a climate controlled office all day and live in a big city apartment, then your clothes might get cleaned with these new front loaders. If you work outside a lot or have kids who play in the dirt or you like to work on cars etc., then front loaders have a harder time removing stains and body oils from sweating in your clothes.

The statement, I made about turning down the water level, has to do with the amount of clothes I see being washed in many of these HE top loaders and front loaders. My friends, who have these new front loaders and HE top loaders, can only wash half of the full loads my Speed Queen top loader can handle or the clothes will not get completely cleaned. So, I wouldn't call the clothes in front loaders or HE top loaders a real "FULL LOAD". These type of washers reminds me of the early low flush toilets, where you were ok if it's number 1 but heaven help you if it's number 2.



Post# 742216 , Reply# 22   3/15/2014 at 18:51 (3,694 days old) by suziboyer ()        
So I got the Speed Queen - And I love it!!!

I am happy with everything about this machine. Thank you all for the excellent advice! I like that is uses plenty of water. My husband is a mechanic. I need something that will CLEAN and for that kind of cleaning I need plenty of water. I have a well with a 40gpm flow at the well itself-- no water issues here.
Thank you all for the great advice. This thing cleans really, really well even with my homemade laundry detergent!


Post# 742242 , Reply# 23   3/15/2014 at 20:23 (3,694 days old) by washman (o)        
The more you use your Speed Queen

the more you will like it.

The sturdy construction not built to a BIG BOX price point along with an industry leading warranty should give you years of dependable service and peace of mind.

Welcome to a growing fraternity of Speed Queen owners/operators.


Post# 742312 , Reply# 24   3/16/2014 at 02:27 (3,694 days old) by washer111 ()        
FL's Cannot Clean:

They can clean, but the electricity network in the U.S. limits this greatly. In order to get a true profile wash (Starts cold and progresses to a selected temperature), you need 240v of electricity to achieve this in reasonable amount of time, or just lots of patience. Something that people don't seem to have these days... 

WITH a profiled washing cycle, you can get perfectly clean clothes - as each type of soil are worked away with detergent and gentle mechanical action (on Miele's, at least) over a wide range of temperatures. 

Even so, some members here have been happy with their FL machines - notably Frigilux: And I think we've ALL seen the performance testing of kitchen whites he repeatedly does!

 

If FL machines were so hopeless in their ability, please explain why those in Europe/UK don't have issues with them?

~ We have different detergents (More enzymes, and better formulations)

~ "Better" electricity supply (240v. No special wiring required)

~ Government mandates to ensure our washers are chasing results, not time savings (At least in Australia), but still highly efficient in their energy consumption

 

In the U.S., your machines take in 120°F water, temper it to 104° or less then wash for 20 minutes or so without a heater, and complete the cycle. (I base this on relatively recent discussion occurring here where machines take about an hour to wash).

There is NO way that will get clothes clean... If you have an FL machine that takes in PROPER hot water or heats it up and washes for long enough, your clothes will get clean. You also need some water to achieve this. But not copious amounts that some people *think* they need. 

 

Of course, there are some people who still think that Cold water can achieve all of this. Well, the fact of the matter is that U.S. machines are practically washing in cold water 100% of the time (Cold is the new Warm, Warm/Hot and HOT) and not delivering results, even with longer cycles. What does that tell you? 


Post# 742313 , Reply# 25   3/16/2014 at 02:31 (3,694 days old) by washer111 ()        
Back on Topic:

Whilst I think the SQ machines are great quality, at least in Australia, I no longer believe they are a worthwhile purchase, for the following reasons:

 

~ You can purchase a High-End Miele or other fancy machine for the same price as an SQ FL or TL machine. They include heaters and more "choice" in their cycles. They (Well, Miele) are built to high standards for domestic machines. SERIOUSLY you don't need an over-built machine for home use, unless you are careless with your washer. 

~ SQ TL machine no longer feature conventional timers that can be set for your choice of washing time, agitation speed etc. Instead, everything is controlled by someone who thinks they "understand" what a Normal cycle constitutes

~ No options for "in-between" water temperatures (ala Fisher and Paykel) or Warm rinses (as redundant as they are)

~ FL machines lack a heater, given the longer cycle times they feature on Australian machines


Post# 742322 , Reply# 26   3/16/2014 at 07:07 (3,693 days old) by washman (o)        
back on topic part 2

Here's what I understand
*it takes water, plenty of it, to properly clean clothes
*HE machines with their plethora of electronic attachments, are notoriously unreliable
*I'm ok with a PC restart when it locks up or MS updates need to be installed. I'm NOT ok having to "reboot" an effing washing machine for god's sake!
*Living alone and working split shifts doing IT support and working part of the weekend, sometimes the WHOLE weekend, I simply don't have the time to waste doing laundry in an eco-sanctioned pile of junk that takes 1-2 hours.
*I don't want to invest in "washing machine cleaner" and again, waste time along with money running a cleaning cycle.
*value for me is how long will the thing last and how much use can I get out of it?


Post# 742429 , Reply# 27   3/16/2014 at 16:31 (3,693 days old) by alineber ()        
Washer 111

I have a SQ TL machine that can wash a "Full Load" of laundry, with two rinses, in 37 minutes.  My water heater is set at 130*F.  My clothes are washed in true warm water.  Yes, my clothes are truly clean and this was accomplished in less time.  I have people at work who constantly ask me what kind of detergent I use, because my clothes look so clean and smell so good.  When I tell them that I use original Tide powder, they look surprised because they are using the same.  I start telling them about my SQ TL, and how my water heater is set higher to give me a true warm wash.  They start telling me about their FL machines and how they hate them.  I just smile at them, while inside I thinking how lucky I am to have my SQ TL.


Post# 742434 , Reply# 28   3/16/2014 at 16:44 (3,693 days old) by brisnat81 (Brisbane Australia)        

Hi alineber

The Miele's we have in AU wash a normally soiled load clean in 40 minutes at 50deg C (120F) with two rinses and a >1200 RPM Spin. This is starting from 10-15degC cold tapwater.

No pretreating and all in 55L (14Gal) of water.

I switched from a BD Whirlpool to a FL nearly 10 years ago and have never looked back.

Can I just make the suggestion that you need to be respectful of other views, You're opinion isn't wrong and you're entitled to it, but neither is mine wrong and I'm entitled to mine.

Taking over every thread with a Speed Queen good, everything else bad is getting a bit a tiresome.

We all get that you and Washman love Speed Queen, It'd be nice if it didn't appear in every single post.

Regards

Nathan


Post# 742464 , Reply# 29   3/16/2014 at 17:29 (3,693 days old) by washman (o)        

hi brisnat81

Remember that we too are entitled to our opinions same as you. Please remember that.

Miele makes a fine machine, no doubt and it was on my list unfortunately the 4080 was discontinued here in the states and the replacement lacked the tub capacity that I wanted. Also I had to take into consideration the ability to get the thing serviced when it breaks.

Beyond that, I also looked at competing brands found at Sears, my local BIG BOX, and 2 independent appliance dealers. I also used google to get links to reviews.

When all is said and done, I still stand by my often cited position. The new HE machines just aren't up to snuff reliability wise. In fact, there was a link on here with a pic of a FL LG that had a massively corroded spider assembly..........are you ready..........after a whopping two years of use!

Another posted a utube link of an LG HE TL machine that literally blew itself to pieces and punched a hole in the wall. Yet another shows a GE HE TL machine with a slightly bent frame piece that allowed the motor assembly to sag and drag against the bottom frame assembly.

Then there's the wonky circuit boards that seem to be very sensitive to any surges. Then you have the error codes that often come up because a pair of jeans refused to balance or something.

Throw in a 1 year factory warranty and sorry, that does not give me any warm and fuzzies regarding these new machines.

Perhaps down under you are sent better machines. I don't rightly know. I'm also realistic enough to know that the SQ is not the same build quality as machines of yesteryear. The dryer, perhaps, but the washer probably not. Still, I feel it is better built than any top loader out there today. And it is well worth the price IMHO.


Post# 742485 , Reply# 30   3/16/2014 at 18:26 (3,693 days old) by washer111 ()        

Miele is most CERTAINLY NOT junk! If you didn't see the recent videos posted about their quality control methods, I'll recap and say that their machines are built for about 10,000 cycles (According to Combo52 SQ TL machines are the same) and are not piles of junk that take "forever" to wash clothes

 

Sure, if you select a cycle with Pre-Wash, Water Plus and a very Hot/Very Cold temperature, it will take longer. But the machine adapts itself to every load I put through it. 

 

The Miele can wash about 7.5KG of clothing with a stuffed drum at 40º if we so choose (A similarly rated TL machine often cannot handle such loads). That will take about 2:30 hours - but considering the size of such a load, I would never have any issues with a load that large taking so long to wash. If I'm pressed for time, I can push the "Short" button and bring the whole affair down to a 1:45 cycle, which is more than enough for clothing items worn daily as part of an office job. 

 

As I've repeatedly said here over time, I usually just wash about a 3.5kg load of clothes (Thats the typical load after sorting) on "Minimum Iron," which takes about an hour, or about 50 minutes if I cut it down and depending on the temperature and options selected. I use that cycle as it provides more water (thus gentler action) on the clothes. Since I don't need hardcore stain removal, I don't need the minimum water level. The cycle uses the same amount of water as the machine would on a fully loaded Cottons cycle, just to put that into perspective for readers. 

 

Other comments about "Washing Machine Cleaner" are met be the following statement: Given CORRECT laundering habits , that is FREQUENT Warm and/or HOT washes, being gentle with fabric softener products and ensuring proper detergent loading, you WILL NOT NEED a washer-cleaner, EVEN in an FL machine. 

Of course, with U.S. machines dumbing water down so cold, and people using so much fabric softeners and other *crap*, I'm not surprised your machines need it. 

 

Our machine runs probably about 3-4 washes above 130ºF (55ºC) every week. Other washes are at "Warm" temperature (40ºC/104ºF), always with Extra Rinse selected. 

The machine has NO mould in the boot, NO odours (except the smell of clean clothes/detergent) and has not had any issues (*touches fibre-board desk*) in the 1.5 years we've had the machine. 


Post# 742487 , Reply# 31   3/16/2014 at 18:31 (3,693 days old) by washman (o)        
washer111

Where was it stated that Miele was/is junk?

Post# 742491 , Reply# 32   3/16/2014 at 18:43 (3,693 days old) by mayfan69 (Brisbane Queensland Australia)        
I wish.....

mayfan69's profile picture
there was a way you could 'block' certain people on this site where you don't have to read their posts and propaganda...just like you can on Facebook or other sites...just like I've already done to one person at least on the autowasher.org friends page...

I think I might put the suggestion to Robert.

Leon


Post# 742493 , Reply# 33   3/16/2014 at 18:57 (3,693 days old) by alineber ()        
Hi brisnat81

In the U.S., your machines take in 120°F water, temper it to 104° or less then wash for 20 minutes or so without a heater, and complete the cycle. (I base this on relatively recent discussion occurring here where machines take about an hour to wash).

There is NO way that will get clothes clean... If you have an FL machine that takes in PROPER hot water or heats it up and washes for long enough, your clothes will get clean. You also need some water to achieve this. But not copious amounts that some people *think* they need. 

 




I was trying to show "washer 111" that I agreed with his statement above.  If you read his post, he thinks that U.S. FL's, without heaters, have problems cleaning clothes.   This is why I told him that I had to raise my water heater to 130*F and why I use the SQ TL machine.  Many of my friends have FL's with no heaters built in and they are having problems.  I'm sorry, if you took my post wrong.  Maybe I didn't word it correctly, but I was not disagreeing with anything he was saying or trying to be disrespectful.  


Taking over every thread with a Speed Queen good, everything else bad is getting a bit a tiresome.  

 

Sorry, if you think that way because that is not my intension.   

 


We all get that you and Washman love Speed Queen, It'd be nice if it didn't appear in every single post.

 

Most of my comments are shown in post about SQ or people here in the U.S. looking for good cleaning, long lasting, high quality washers or people unhappy with their FL washers.   I will not hold back my opinion from these post no matter how many there might be, but I will try to keep it out of others.


 

Regards,

Allen


Post# 742497 , Reply# 34   3/16/2014 at 19:02 (3,693 days old) by mrb627 (Buford, GA)        
Unfortunate Perspective

mrb627's profile picture
But I would say that Miele is not the same around the world and the Australia does get a better performing machine simply due to the power at which the machine operates.

Malcolm



Post# 742505 , Reply# 35   3/16/2014 at 19:18 (3,693 days old) by washman (o)        
Well said alineber

:)

Post# 742518 , Reply# 36   3/16/2014 at 19:48 (3,693 days old) by kenmoreguy89 (Valenza Piemonte, Italy- Soon to be US immigrant.)        
Washer111 & company

kenmoreguy89's profile picture
I do not really want to start another FL vs TL thread....
But I can read you say some Inaccuracies...first of all networks and voltage in US does not limit that always, there are models of Miele and Bosch with a built in heater working with 120 volt....
Front load vd top load:
I can speak from an italian persepctive, and PERSONALLY having used and seen lots of FL machines with heaters and that can boil, not to mention the US fl's machine whenever they are set up to fill water not hot enough, and can say you here that NONE of them used to give a performance paragonable to a Top loader agitator machine*, both in warm, hot or boil washings and with the so acclaimed staged, hours long cycles.
* (accordingly that you use it with proper water temperature so I mean hot enough and proper cycle).
Based on my experinces, from what I could see and my way of thought, I think that the method of washing of a front loader cannot be paragonable to an agitator washer in matter of cleaning simply because there is no way that wet clothes tumbling in a drum have the chanche to have washing solution forced into them in a way able to remove dirt and stains as effectively as an agitator washer does by beating clothes through water and having the solution forced through them, freely with a greater force, homogeneity and effectiveness, before you mention time, I say that I think that even if they tumble four hours would probably never get clean enough.
I could experiment that also.... When using a front loader I used to extend further the wash time by crank back the knob trying to schieve cleaner results, having wash times as long as 3 hours and half and sometimes with bio soak overnight, but even in those occasions had laundry came out with spots and halos I knew my Filter-flo would have never left back...

Can also tell you that it is the same for the many italians that spend fortunes in these machines and find them way better than the previous FL machine they had including former Miele owners, what I can read and hear most of the times is that people can finally achieve the results without the usual pretreatring and or manual prewash soak they always had to do before (practice very common over here since the advent of automstics, , that me indeed of course never had the need to do, toss in and dah dah...clean!)

So, very different from you....

So here is the thing, since it all started from it:
Out there there are lots of people who don't find front loaders being as good as toploaders, and you can read it in many reviews, the same way there are people who find them better than their previous top loader...
So who's right?
None you can tell, unless you start an endless speech taking in exam lots of variants that made them to arrive to this conclusion, it would really be nice if we would do further investigations in both the cases and do a factual speech, like the former top loader owner that loves his new heating front loader, well perhaps that one could not reach an enough hot temperature and then he comes to find the front loader better as it finally reach a proper temperature heating his own water...
Then there are the ones that regrets having their old top loader back after having bought a new front loader and share their fond hate toward front loaders, HE and such...
Lots of other variants can make one's opinion....
As for everything, the best one could do, is sharing his own opinions and findings based on own experiences or ones he knows of....especially in threads requesting an opinion like this one.
Nobody is wrong or right, so if one finds that front loaders sucks compared to top loaders should be free to say so without objections, the same way who thinks otherwise....
Let's just don't start wars over it......









This post was last edited 03/17/2014 at 00:34
Post# 742544 , Reply# 37   3/16/2014 at 20:54 (3,693 days old) by washer111 ()        
Here is Where you "Implied" It

"*value for me is how long will the thing last and how much use can I get out of it?"

 

Miele's sell at a similar price point (or cheaper, sometimes), are manufactured to withstand years of domestic use (and abuse...), add more features and have high efficiency.

 

And for the record, I'm not interesting in starting the FL/TL debate. Merely setting the record straight and correcting misconceptions people seem to have. I won't be contributing any more to this thread - as it seems that people are offended by my opinions, or perhaps their own fear of the truth.


Post# 742549 , Reply# 38   3/16/2014 at 21:09 (3,693 days old) by washman (o)        
washer111 you missed the point

I never implied Miele was cheap or junk. I know what I typed and nothing of the sort was "implied". That my friend is entirely YOUR perception.

Perhaps you read further down when I said in part ".........when it breaks........." which it will. As will the Speed Queen.

Hillmon Appliance, my closest dealer about 40 minutes away, offered their machines starting, I repeat, starting at $1600. That is US currency btw. And that did not include the pedestal either.

That is almost twice what I paid for the Speed Queen.

And, no local dealers service Miele in my area. None. Zilch. Zero. Which means I have to rely on a single dealer a long way off for service.

OTOH, I bought the washer from one dealer locally and the dryer from a second dealer because he had a better price AND both service what they sell. This is part of what I mean by value.

Clear now?


Post# 742554 , Reply# 39   3/16/2014 at 21:25 (3,693 days old) by kenmoreguy89 (Valenza Piemonte, Italy- Soon to be US immigrant.)        
Merely setting the record straight and correcting misconcept

kenmoreguy89's profile picture
Merely setting the record straight and correcting misconceptions people seem to have.

Do not want to sound like a bitch..
BUT

Are you really sure you have that much of power or authority to determine whatever needs to be "corrected"?
Don't take this for bad...please...
I have seen you " correcting" " many things that could be called anything but opinable sentences or Ie "opinions"..... that really does not need to be corrected simply because they ain't right nor wrong...
As for the ones of yours.....
I think no one fears the truth here, because no one can say to be the TRUTH IN PERSON, one can just say what are their findings snd accept whatever are differents thoughts and opinions and take them for what they're are, some sentences I have seen in your posts indeed sounded like decrees/ verdicts..
No one here can say to have the suthority or power to do that as we still are in a democratical country and forum....
But perhaps it is me seing ot that way....



Post# 742558 , Reply# 40   3/16/2014 at 21:33 (3,693 days old) by chetlaham (United States)        
power limitations

chetlaham's profile picture
US power availability does limit the front load built in heater market. How and why we choose to run home branch circuits at 120 still blows my mind. In this day and age no justification exists.

Most front loaders are shipped with a NEMA 5-15 plug which only gives 1800 watts max. Most heaters end up being about 1000 to 1200 watts. About 300 to 400 watts are left over for the motor since tumble and heat is needed. While 1000 watts will still heat the water it takes a lot of time, and from cold to a boil wash that can take over an hour alone for the wash. Compact machines none to bad, but give them a full size and consumers will be asking why. A Euro plug on the other hand can pull 13 or 16 amps at 230 volts. 3000 watts to 3700 watts of available power. A euro washer can easily be equipped with a 2000 to 3000 watt heater, in this example will say 2500 watts. That's 2 and 1/2 times more heating power which makes the consumer happier. Most euro machines are more leaning toward compact, so it adds to the time reduction even more. However, if we wanted to get similar results in our full size front loads I would estimate about a 3500 to 4200 watts of heating power would be needed.

The good news for us: literally 96% of houses can get 4800 watts of power at their washer outlets without upgrading any wiring. The NEC has required for decades a dedicated 20 amp 12 gauge circuit be run to the laundry area for the washer. 96% of houses have a dedicated number 12 from the panel to the washer's receptacle. By code that circuit cant leave the laundry area, and technically cant be run to any light fixtures. All one needs to do is swap the single pole breaker to a double and change the outlet to a NEMA 6-20r. Presto 4800 watts of power. Appliance makers can then add NEMA 6-20p plugs to washers and in turn stronger heaters. Imagine a Duet with a 4500 watt heater :D Major time savings on a sani wash.


Bosch btw has a neat trick up its sleeve. Some of their home dryers for the US market plug into a standard 240 volt 30 amp dryer circuit. A 15 amp 240 volt plug is provided at the back of the dryer for a 240 volt front load with heater. But if one wanted just the washer they could do the above mentioned too.

IMO, a front load with no heater is half a washer.



Post# 742559 , Reply# 41   3/16/2014 at 21:36 (3,693 days old) by washer111 ()        
Okay, I'll Bite

(And make myself a hypocrite).

No, I don't feel I have "power or authority" to correct. I form opinions based on what I read here, and what I've experienced in my own personal activities.

 

Therefore, when I see people spreading misconceptions I bite and "correct" them. I'm sorry, if people are offended by that, then I apologize.

 


Post# 742566 , Reply# 42   3/16/2014 at 22:32 (3,693 days old) by kenmoreguy89 (Valenza Piemonte, Italy- Soon to be US immigrant.)        

kenmoreguy89's profile picture
No you're not hypocrite....I think all have understand your points and your ideas, that's what matters... Just let to the readers determine iwhatever you say is, according to each one of them, unless they're factual things, opinions can be agreed or disagreed, partially or wholly, but never and say never universally right nor wrong, nor in need of corrections , just limit to say your opinions and let them be what they're, not corrections or verdicts, but opinIons...
Just to make an example...
You jumped out from the sentence about having to wash twice with frontloaders (not washing well) , you assumed immediately that It was fault of US ones not heating water, started shooting verdicts and kept saying at how shit they are because of this, kinda sanctifying Miele or european ones, how did you know he was referring and talking of a US non heating front loader and never tried also one with an heater?
As you can see I feel exactly the same about the ones that heat.... And do not let me speak about ones that don't...
You give fault to this and wash times, but what about if others reasons other than wash temperatures and or times were involved in the fact that so many people in the US and the poster don't find FL as good as top loaders agitators?


You see....

What about if an american indeed would say: " eh I think now in OZ they find these front loader better for a simple reason, I find their top loaders to be crappy toys like machines, , that generally does not have a good agitation, so it's natural there they like 'em so much than they do over here"...
That's an example.....
What about if one would say so? That would be an opinion, if starting with "I think", different is if it mentioned like a fact, judgment and or verdict stating it as an untouchable truth as some of your lines appers to be,I think that if a reader is smart wold look up himself after this and determine whenever having to agree or disagree....but never say "you're wrong"-"it is not so" as a matter of fact.
His words versus yours....who will win....nobody, nonody will be right or wrong.
Again, the way you came up sounded a bit pretentious and Judgmental.....at least to me....let opinions be what they're...
Have a good night to all...







This post was last edited 03/17/2014 at 00:50

Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

The Discuss-o-Mat has stopped, buzzer is sounding!!!
If you would like to reply to this thread please log-in...

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy