Thread Number: 56827
/ Tag: Classified Ad Finds
Kenmore top load cloth washer - $75 (Sheffield,MA) |
[Down to Last] |
Post# 791373   10/30/2014 at 20:10 (3,474 days old) by ovrphil (N.Atlanta / Georgia )   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
|
Post# 791432 , Reply# 1   10/31/2014 at 05:58 (3,474 days old) by appnut (TX)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 791572 , Reply# 2   11/1/2014 at 04:41 (3,473 days old) by 70series ( Connecticut.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
That is a 1966 Model 600 series. From the look of the agitator that is the plastic Rotoswirl which was a revision to the original bakelite agitator this model was given. If so, the model number is 110.6604601. |
Post# 791578 , Reply# 3   11/1/2014 at 07:19 (3,473 days old) by ovrphil (N.Atlanta / Georgia )   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
James and Bob - thanks, I thought at first it was (don't laugh) an 800, until I did a search. I just read most of this:
www.automaticwasher.org/cgi-bin/T... Would the 1967 version of this 600, the "bread and butter" as Gordon said, for Sears/Kenmore, be any different looking or operationally different? |
Post# 791595 , Reply# 4   11/1/2014 at 10:12 (3,473 days old) by appnut (TX)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 791660 , Reply# 6   11/1/2014 at 22:11 (3,472 days old) by ovrphil (N.Atlanta / Georgia )   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Based on those distinguishing features, I'd gladly take that '66 for the water temp selections. Super Rotoswirl agitator...! ....do your clothes get "denuded" (de-threaded) in the final rinse? Imposing marketing adjectives, you gotta love the imagination splashed around. Of the two, I wonder what Gordon might say of each in their overall performance or operation? Thanks James.
|
Post# 791693 , Reply# 8   11/2/2014 at 07:11 (3,472 days old) by ovrphil (N.Atlanta / Georgia )   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
It's just me and my drama - denuding, etc; the Super Rotoswirl just filters through (my brain) as a bit dramatic and comedic-no goal to undermine it by me being amused by its marketing name. Thanks for the information and connecting a visual of the agitator with performance. Someone else is welcome to it; no room to collect and there are many interesting machines out there.
|