Thread Number: 63860
/ Tag: Vintage Automatic Washers
Living with a Hotpoint Toploader (UK) |
[Down to Last] |
|
Post# 864339 , Reply# 1   1/27/2016 at 15:23 (3,011 days old) by triumphtoledo (Shropshire/Worcestershire)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 864343 , Reply# 2   1/27/2016 at 15:47 (3,011 days old) by chestermikeuk (Rainhill *Home of the RailwayTrials* Merseyside,UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Hi Rob, good to hear you got the Hotpoint fully restored and working to order, great machines and so versatile.
Had mine a few years now and its had a full renovation, seals n bearings a few years ago. Great to use with a combi boiler and / or tanked hot water , would not want to pay the bill for cold water heating ha ha. Like you say a little noisy but worth it for the nostalgia, although the spin brake coming on can give you a nasty shock until you get used to it..I tried to match up the bluey purple colour for renovation, nearest I got is Peugeot Midnight Blue which is a great match. What powder are you using in it? |
Post# 864358 , Reply# 3   1/27/2016 at 16:51 (3,011 days old) by Launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
*LOL*
Your list is a basic summary of the debate that has raged on in the USA for ages regarding H-Axis vs. top loading washers with a central beater. In their first incarnations; wringer washers, one could at least save and reuse much of that hot/soapy wash water. Automatics did away with the "dangers" of wringers but also meant sending hot water used just once down the drain. To compensate for this various "suds saving" systems were invented. Many including Consumer Reports (our version of your Which?) didn't think highly of that process. Pointing out the water cooled while being held over and quite frankly still contained dirt from the first load. Have two front loaders (older Miele and Oko-Lavamat), but yes from time to time you cannot beat a good top loader wash, can you? For now have only the Hoover TT as sold off my Whirlpool "convertible" automatic, but who knows what the future will bring. Main difference between us here in the States and the UK is we never had self heating top loaders. Thus to prevent setting protein and other stains with a "hot" wash it had to be proceeded by a cool or warm pre-soak or pre-wash. Our machines depended upon whatever temperature water came out of the taps. In days of old households set their water heaters higher so water of 180F (or above) routinely came out of all hot water taps. That or hot water coming out of the boiler or heater was tempered down to 120F for general use but for say the kitchen and or laundry/utility room full frontal hot water was available. The other main difference here is of course Americans were and mostly still are wedded to using chlorine bleach. In absence of profile and or boil washes one simply bleached the heck out of whites to remove stains/keep things bright. |
Post# 864365 , Reply# 4   1/27/2016 at 17:12 (3,011 days old) by Sesteve (London, UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Hi Rob
As you know I'm a huge fan of these machines - I have a load of really muddy clothes in it at the moment - the water is filthy but I know it will come clean in the end. I was a bit sceptical of the static rinse on both the 1504 and 1509 but it seems to do the job even with modern automatic powders - these can use handwash/twin tub ones too which seem to be designed to rinse even better. My mum swore that her towels always came out softer in the top loader without using fabric softner which was something she hated when she got her built in Neff when the kitchen was fitted out for the first time - that meant the top loader had to go. It does seem to keep things a bit softer. I always thought that my 1509 must have had a replacement programme knob even though it was a new machine when I got it - I thought it might have been a seconds machine as it is a different shade to the temperature one but I can see that both yours and Mike's to a lesser extent seem to be different shades too so perhaps it was how they were manufactured. I definitely agree on the annual inspection. They are such workhorses it would be quite easy to not notice some of the leaks that might start off small. I've always thought about taking off the drive nut and lifting the bowl out on a regular basis to try and stop them fusing together but I guess I could do more damage. Anyway, glad you are enjoying it and hope the brake noise doesn't scare the kids too much! S :) |
Post# 864472 , Reply# 5   1/28/2016 at 09:35 (3,010 days old) by keymatic (London / UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Hi Rob, nice overall analysis of the machine, and i agree these machines do have their disadvantages as well as advantages.
My mum had a 1509 when i was growing up and always luved the purple touches which were very advanced for the domestic market at that time. I have a 1504 which i have had for many years now and as Steve briefly touched on i was sceptical of the rinsing, however now 10 years on and I think it does an ok job, I have noticed sometimes that if i do a particularly sudsy wash sometimes there can be a bit of residue especially on dark colours as sometimes the suds linger from the static rinse and merge into the final agitated rinse. I recently picked up a brand new 9605 and am looking forward to comparing the wash cycles and results on both. Cheers Keith
View Full Size
|
Post# 867920 , Reply# 7   2/19/2016 at 16:24 (2,988 days old) by robliverpool (england Liverpool)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
My very first automatic washer was a top loader hotpoint and I loved it. I was only 17 and had my own place and it cost me 45 quid second hand. I lived above a hairdressers and washed their towels daily for them and the machine got them spotless
I would have one of these in an instant if I wasn't on a water meter. Been reading up and in the foreseeable future every home in the UK will have to be fitted with a water meter so make the most while you can. I know what you mean about the spin. It just purrs away silently. The only issues I had with mine was the waste hose it would sometimes pop off and flood the kitchen lol. Other than that it was fantastic |
Post# 867941 , Reply# 8   2/19/2016 at 19:05 (2,988 days old) by Launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 867978 , Reply# 9   2/20/2016 at 04:10 (2,988 days old) by electron1100 (England)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
These have always been my favourite Hotpoint washing machines, I bought two broken ones back from work and made one working one, the wash/rinse performance is excellent.
They are also a pleasure to use. QUILTS Just out of interest I could not get a double winter quilt in my Hoover 4.5 Kg front loader, but I can wash one double summer quilt in there and as it is an old washer it has very high water levels which are perfect for washing quilts etc, so in the winter I use 2 summer quilts together problem solved of washing quilts. Gary |
Post# 867987 , Reply# 10   2/20/2016 at 05:55 (2,988 days old) by marky_mark (From Liverpool. Now living in Palm Springs and Dublin)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
If you have a water meter, doing a load in the Hotpoint toploader will cost around 30 pence more in water compared to a front loader.
Gary's Hoover FL probably uses something like 120 litres per cycle. I find my modern FL machine uses 60-80 litres for most cycles with 2 high level rinses. My Hotpoint TL specifies 69 litres per fill, with 3 fills per cycle plus a tub flush. However, when filled with a normal load of clothes, I find it uses around 170 litres per cycle. So the Hotpoint is using about 100 litres more than my FL. If you have a water meter in the UK, you're probably paying somewhere around £3 per cubic metre, depending on your company/region. This is assuming you have both municipal water and sewerage (sewerage is generally the more expensive component). I don't think UK metered rates are tiered. So the extra 100 litres will cost an extra £0.30. Doing 5 loads per week in the TL will cost an extra £1.50 per week in water compared to a modern FL.
Even so, you may well find that your water bill is lower with a water meter compared to paying the fixed amount for unmetered water. |
Post# 869613 , Reply# 13   2/28/2016 at 16:20 (2,979 days old) by matchboxpaul (U.K)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
:-) |