|
Thread Number: 703
Extremly sudsy wash! |
[Down to Last] |  |
| Post# 50687 12/9/2004 at 18:38 (7,067 days old) by compwhiz () | ||
|
I was doing a small load of whites and while it was washing suds floated up to the top of the primary tub it was kewl check out the pic below 
| ||
|
| Post# 50688 , Reply# 1 12/9/2004 at 18:48 (7,067 days old) by compwhiz () | ||
|
Heres what happened when it threw the water CLICK HERE TO GO TO compwhiz's LINK | ||
Post# 50714 , Reply# 2 12/9/2004 at 23:28 (7,067 days old) by CleanteamofNY  ((Monroe, New York) |
||
 | ||
| Post# 50725 , Reply# 3 12/10/2004 at 09:08 (7,066 days old) by PeterH770 (Marietta, GA) | ||
 | ||
|
Post# 50726 , Reply# 4 12/10/2004 at 09:44 (7,066 days old) by CleanteamofNY ((Monroe, New York) |
||
|
| ||
| Post# 50830 , Reply# 6 12/12/2004 at 13:31 (7,064 days old) by Compwhiz () | ||
|
ill trade you :-p lol | ||
|
Post# 50972 , Reply# 7 12/14/2004 at 08:20 (7,062 days old) by CleanteamofNY ((Monroe, New York) |
||
|
Kitchenaid Agitator
I got it yesterday and I see why their machines does not need to use 120 SPM on their machine. THE SKIRT BLADES ARE HUGE!!! Whirlpool should have made this an straight vane instead of DA. There is no need for the auger when I've used this bad boy on the High water level with a load and it roll the clothes over without the help of the auger. The rollover rate should be just as good on the Extra High setting! Anyway, I need new dogs (Auger/Spiral part) for this puppy and done 4 loads just using the base and the rollover rate at 90 SPM is the same as using an BD doing 68 SPM which is a good thing! It kick up some suds at the beginning of the cycle but for some reason it get knocked down during the wash, I wonder why? Slightly hard water stupid! :-)) Oh well....., at 120 SPM does put a major drag on the motor and transmission, so a extra large load at that speed will not be used! This agitator at 120 SPM puts too much stress on the suspension system, tranny and motor, so it is best to kick it down a notch or I will be pressed to do an tranny replacement in 2 years or less..... | ||
| Post# 51004 , Reply# 9 12/14/2004 at 15:14 (7,062 days old) by PeterH770 (Marietta, GA) | ||
|
| ||
|
Post# 51018 , Reply# 10 12/14/2004 at 17:34 (7,062 days old) by gansky1 (Omaha, The Home of the TV Dinner!) |
||
 | ||
| Post# 51023 , Reply# 11 12/14/2004 at 17:59 (7,062 days old) by partscounterman (Cortez, Colorado) | ||
|
slower stroke tranny? I did not know there was a slower stroke tranny- I thought it all had to do with the motor speed-please enlighten me! | ||
| Post# 51055 , Reply# 12 12/14/2004 at 19:59 (7,062 days old) by Compwhiz () | ||
|
Off ballance Durring throw spin the suds covered part of the drum so when water drained out the unplugged hole it went bam----bam----bam---bam---bam--bam--bam-bam-bambambambambambam and it stoped eventualy | ||
|
Post# 51104 , Reply# 13 12/15/2004 at 07:37 (7,061 days old) by CleanteamofNY ((Monroe, New York) |
||
|
Yes I will be careful gansky, for the smell of straining motor was in the air yesterday! I did get a chance to put a Queen size spread using the extra high water level without the auger and the rollover is awesome at 90 SPM! Hummmmm........, over worked, need more suds....., Hummmm over worked, need more suds. Sorry my washer just had to pray! LOL | ||
| Forum Index: |
| Other Forums: |
|
|
|
|
|
Comes to the Rescue!
