Thread Number: 86856
/ Tag: Vintage Dishwashers
Why Did Older Dishwasher Have Such Enormous Motors? |
[Down to Last] | ![]() |
Post# 1114196   4/10/2021 at 14:09 (1,468 days old) by chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 1    
![]() I mean why were they so big considering modern dishwashers get dishes clean with a 50 watt motor?
Why not make a two port sump (think plastisol tubs) and add a removable find filter basket? 180 watt wash pump like this:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/GE-Washer-Drain...
And a 25 watt drain pump like this but in shaded pole version:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/GE-WD19X10015-D...
Frog eye or cat eye spray arm with small holes. Continuous advancement timer (like on GE machines) where the drain pump starts and the wash motor shuts off 30 seconds latter. Similarly after the drain pump shuts off, fill starts and 30 seconds latter the wash pump comes on.
I think this would have been cheaper, used less water and reduced carry over water found in many designs.
Why not have gone this route? Speed Queen could pull if off today if we wanted a no frill machine but also respected modern design. |
![]() |
Post# 1114370 , Reply# 1   4/11/2021 at 23:12 (1,467 days old) by rollermatic (columbus and milford ohio)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 2    
![]()
i have a lot of old dishwashers and the bigger the motor and the more water they use the better in my book! but i'm into them for the nostalgia of it. the old hobart kitchenaids had 1/2 hp motors, the gold seal motor they called it. i have a bunch of kitchenaids, over 20 and i have never had a problem with a motor yet! i've had lots of other issues, but not those powerful motors. hobart used to advertise them as lasting longer because the bigger motor would be under less stress.
and i think the rest of them used 1/3 hp motors, most of them 3450 rpm, but hotpoint used a 1/3 hp 1725 rpm on it's old machines, i have 2 of those plus one new extra motor. they used a big wash pump with a big water slinger impeller since their motors ran slower. but the g.e. mobile maids used a 3450 rpm 1/3 hp motor. not sure what maytag and whirlpool used, although i do have a maytag front load in harvest gold from early 70's that has a horizontal pump and motor and it's gotta be at least 1/3 hp i would guess. i would say back in the early days no one was concerned about energy usage and the idea was to build these machines to last which indeed they do or we would not have all these great 50 year old machines still working fine! and they had powerful pumps and used a lot more water because again no one was worried about water usage. these new machines i have no respect for, they drizzle a cup full of water around and take 2 hours to do a load, please! give me a water guzzling kitchenaid or frigidaire any day! but then i only run them for hobby so energy usage is not an issue. at least with me. manufacturers definately believed bigger was better! |
Post# 1114380 , Reply# 2   4/12/2021 at 03:02 (1,466 days old) by qsd-dan (West)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 3    
![]()
Big motor + lots of hot steamy water + brute force + phosphates + bleach was how the dishes got cleaned in a timely manner.
Whirlpool Ultrawash/Power Clean dishwashers were still using a 1/3 HP motor through 2010. Detergent with phosphates and bleach were available through 2009, so it wasn't all that long ago. |
Post# 1114488 , Reply# 5   4/12/2021 at 22:15 (1,466 days old) by AcesUp8000 (Canada)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 1    
1/2 Horsepower Motor The KitchenAids from the 15 Series to the 21 Series used the 1/2 Horsepower motor that was made by Hobart. Once Whirlpool took over KitchenAid, I think they eventually made these dishwasher motors weaker. |
Post# 1114572 , Reply# 6   4/13/2021 at 17:55 (1,465 days old) by johnb300m (Chicago)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 1114613 , Reply# 7   4/14/2021 at 10:37 (1,464 days old) by vacerator (Macomb, Michigan)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 2    
really clean dishes well too! They cheapend the motors and pumps, and raised prices of course. |
Post# 1114857 , Reply# 8   4/17/2021 at 07:50 (1,461 days old) by combo52 ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 1    
![]() The KD10-14 machines had a 1/4 HP motor and the KD15-22 machines had a 1/2 HP motor.
Whirlpool did claim that the KD23 series had a 1/2 HP motor but it was the same size as the standard WP DW motor which was rated at 1/3 HP.
These large split phase motors were reliable but only about 30% efficient at best at converting power used to washing power.
John L. |
Post# 1196806 , Reply# 9   1/9/2024 at 16:40 (464 days old) by GELaundry4ever ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 1    
I believe that having a big motor equals power in every way, including spray and drain power. These are my thoughts. |
Post# 1196923 , Reply# 10   1/11/2024 at 11:43 (462 days old) by norgeway (mocksville n c )   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 2    
Worked ok, but were the all time noisiest dishwashers ever made.They sound like a garbage disposal fighting a chainsaw lol. |
Post# 1196936 , Reply# 11   1/11/2024 at 16:36 (462 days old) by Maytag85 (Sean A806)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 1197010 , Reply# 13   1/12/2024 at 22:22 (461 days old) by combo52 ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]()
Hi Steve, what model were portable dishwasher do you have? They made several different styles over the years.
I have two 35-year-old whirlpool built-in whirlpools in my kitchen. I do have concerns about some of the aspects of the new machines they do get dishes very clean, however. But I like the cycle times of the older ones in the fact that they will wash away so much food soil without ever ever having a filter to clean.
View Full Size
|
Post# 1197064 , Reply# 14   1/13/2024 at 20:28 (460 days old) by Launderess ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 1    
![]() |
Post# 1197757 , Reply# 15   1/23/2024 at 12:51 (450 days old) by DaveAMKrayoGuy ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 1197761 , Reply# 16   1/23/2024 at 13:24 (450 days old) by chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 1    
![]()
That pictures wells up a lot of emotion in me, including deep sadness and longing. I wish that PowerClean was still being made today. No other dishwasher comes close in the history of humanity. If everyone was like me that dishwasher would be in every kitchen across the globe and the heater wouldn't cut off after the thermal hold... Sadly when the tall tubs were introduced people began buying them and it only increased. Whirlpool was clever, they had the point voyager which kind of mimicked the power clean to help get a certain number people on board with the idea- as if nothing was missing- then quietly switched to the filter design. All around messed up. I dislike how passive and naive people are.
|
Post# 1197762 , Reply# 17   1/23/2024 at 13:28 (450 days old) by qsd-dan (West)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 3    
![]()
Smaller motors don't do more work, they just run 6 times longer to get the same job done. Instead of 20-30 minutes during the wash and rinse cycles, it's 1-2+ hours. Between weak designed motors to save electrical costs and reduced water levels to save water, dishwashers are quickly heading towards alternating wash arms as being the norm. Probably expect longer cycles times from them in the future.
|
Post# 1197771 , Reply# 18   1/23/2024 at 15:12 (450 days old) by combo52 ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 4    
![]()
Have been alternating wash arms for over a decade now, this practice fix the dishwasher quieter, allows it to have less water that has to be heated in the machine, and generally does an excellent job
By any measure newer dishwashers today get things cleaner than the older machines ever could that’s the advantage of a long cycle. It will soak things off and then scrub them off that older dishwasher couldn’t touch, except on the very long and energy intensive pots and pans cycles that a few machines had. John |
Post# 1197852 , Reply# 19   1/24/2024 at 20:25 (449 days old) by norgeway (mocksville n c )   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 2    
Anything new is worth anything, But John is right, I have a 2 year old GE dishwasher and yes it takes a long time, but it cleans perfectly, burned on casseroles etc come out spotless. |
Post# 1197853 , Reply# 20   1/24/2024 at 20:45 (449 days old) by appnut ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 1197858 , Reply# 21   1/24/2024 at 22:17 (449 days old) by qsd-dan (West)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 3    
![]()
Yeah, I'm aware of longer cycles cleaning stubborn items. For years, I have posted pics my KDS-18 with an externally mounted switch to the timer motor that I can stall anywhere during the entire cycle. Thing is, stalling the timer just an extra 10 minutes or so during the wash cycle (pretty much doubling it) achieves the same results as hours on a newer dishwasher. It's extremely rare that I burn anything since I was never a fan of consuming hot foods or drinks.
BTW, the home I moved into almost 4 years ago came a Kitchenaid dishwasher from 2012 in the main kitchen. The KDS-18 resides in the kitchenette for occasional fun use now. It's quiet but sucks even with pots and pans with every single option selected. And that's on mechanically softened water. I make and eat a lot of homemade soups and it leaves residue all of the time, every time in my clear glass bowls. I never had that problem with 18 on very hard water and extremely short wash cycles before installing timer motor switch. I'm not worried about the residue as it's clean enough for me but I don't use those dishes when company is around. I'll take pics of my next load. My brother has virtually the identical dishwasher he bought brand new, just with top controls rather than front. I quickly understood why they rinse every dish under the kitchen faucet before putting it in the dishwasher. They get away with using the normal cycle using this method. Noticed when I mention alternating arms, I said it quickly becoming the norm, not something newly released. So John, when are swapping out your 80's Powerclean for a new dishwasher ;)
View Full Size
|
Post# 1197860 , Reply# 22   1/25/2024 at 00:02 (449 days old) by chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 1    
![]()
Dan, you bring up a good observation. Higher water pressure (mechanical energy) in a vintage machine can in theory achieve the same results as a modern machine but requiring less time.
With cool water Powercleans did that. At 8 minutes into the Main wash they would do a thermal hold until the water was heated to 140*F which extended the main wash considerably. |
Post# 1197879 , Reply# 23   1/25/2024 at 11:33 (448 days old) by qsd-dan (West)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 1    
![]()
Agree, it was a good balance of power, fast time cycles, and clean results. A couple of other designs had the right balance too but the reliability wasn't there (mainly in the electronics), like some of Maytags post RR dishwashers.
Most users today want a dead silent machine and it's just not happening with a 1/3 HP motor. The EPA wants the machine to use a trickle of water and electricity which throws more obstacles into the game. Manufactures today want to build the platform as cheap as possible and have it last just past the warranty and die soon after to boost profits. And here we are. |
Post# 1212376 , Reply# 25   8/17/2024 at 07:16 (243 days old) by chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 1    
![]() Sadly, all true Dan. Big motors are noisy and reduce capacity at face value- so few want them now. I say at face value in that while a tall tub can hold more dishes, nothing is gained with any type of scrubbing, pre-rinsing, or pre-washing as with so many of today's tall tubs.
Nothing can outperform a Whirlpool Power Clean Filter module. It is the true definition of loading baked on, dried on, nasty without any type of pre-treatment coming out spotless with minimum water and energy.
The following is what a real dishwasher looks like. Simple and cheap, energy efficient- yet long lasting lasting, no nonsense, and 100% clean.
40 minute main wash, heater runs the whole time to achieve temps in excess of 150*F, lots of pressure and water movement, plus the famous soil removal, retention and flush away of the PC module.
The fact that nothing like this has ever been built is everything that is wrong with the world.
Enjoy! :)
|
Post# 1212377 , Reply# 26   8/17/2024 at 07:30 (243 days old) by chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 1    
![]() Jerome, want a real results? You need several things:
1) Main wash water temps over 150*F, preferably 180-190*F.
2) Main wash times of at least 30 minutes, preferably longer.
3) water volume
4) water pressure
5) multi directional targeted water distribution
6) strong maceration
7) High capacity fine filter
8) particle flush away
9) Long heated detergent prewash (if needed)
Every dishwasher ever sold has been some combination of these 9, but never has anyone actually sold a dishwasher that managed to meet all 9 in the high notes despite being feasible with minimal engineering.
People are being sold jokes Jerome that always manage to come centimeters close to the itch but never actually scratch it, thats for sure.
|
Post# 1212395 , Reply# 27   8/17/2024 at 10:56 (243 days old) by GELaundry4ever ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
Sadly, most joes and janes don't care. As far as they're concerned, as long as they're silent, it's fine with them. I want to hear my dishwasher doing something at least spraying the water around. That's how I know it works. Period. This is why I wish dishwashers had clear glass windows. |
Post# 1212398 , Reply# 28   8/17/2024 at 11:08 (243 days old) by chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() Well I think to a degree they do care- you've got folks pre-rinsing without fully realizing its a reaction to the fact most modern dishwashers (and even some old ones) just can't clean like a Power Clean Filter Module, Hobart Kitchen-Aid or Maytag JetClean.
If everyone was like me the Power Clean Filter Module with the above wiring diagram and cycle sequence would probably dominate being in 98% of all Kitchens. I say probably, because chances are that Power Clean Module would be complimented with a water inlet temperature booster and a second set of fresh water spray arms as seen in commercial dish machines.
Ignore the the energy star label, its won't mean a thing in my world ROTFIL!!!!!!! |
Post# 1212488 , Reply# 29   8/18/2024 at 14:40 (242 days old) by johnb300m (Chicago)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 3    
![]() |
Post# 1212489 , Reply# 30   8/18/2024 at 14:51 (242 days old) by johnb300m (Chicago)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 2    
![]() |
Post# 1212491 , Reply# 31   8/18/2024 at 15:07 (242 days old) by Maytag85 (Sean A806)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 5    
![]() |
Post# 1212503 , Reply# 32   8/18/2024 at 16:05 (242 days old) by qsd-dan (West)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 4    
![]()
My KDS-18 uses 16 gallons and it doesn't bother me in the least, especially when compared to running 45-47-ish gallons PER load in my 806 with it's modified spray rinse cycle.
Vintage water hogging dishwasher, vintage 4-5 gallon toilets, and vintage top loaders. Ya know what my water bill averages per month? $25-$30. |
Post# 1212539 , Reply# 33   8/19/2024 at 04:22 (241 days old) by chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 3    
![]()
@Johnb300m- Please I politely ask you to stop with the negativity. Post #29 adds nothing of value to the discussion.
Anyway, yes, the Heavy wash on this dishwasher does indeed use 13.2 gallons of water per cycle. The timer can be started in 3 places:
Heavy- 13.2 Gallons
Medium - 11 Gallons
Light - 8.8 Gallons
None of these cycles waste water or electricity- on the contrary they save order of magnitude more water and electricty as there is no need to manually pre-rinse, prewash, soak, scrub, use the rinse and hold cycle, afresh cycle or the need to clean the machines filter. All that is taken and done by the machine.
The water ussage here is the ideal amount needed to realistically clean dishware unlike the DOE energy cycle which only takes water and energy usage at face value without evaluating actual performance short and long term. There is even an extra fill and drain in the rinse cycle to let the user generously dose on detergent worry free (if needed) and to aid in soil carry away post main wash. Dishes in this machine actually go in untouched besides scrapping. Water should never touch used plates until they are actually in the dishwasher.
|
Post# 1212543 , Reply# 34   8/19/2024 at 06:47 (241 days old) by Combo52 ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 7    
![]()
Chet and Jerome You are in the classic Appliance thread where we talk about vintage appliances and problems. Everything you two guys have posted is just make believe it has nothing to do with anything.
U2 can talk among yourselves on the message board etc This is not an attack on you guys personally, but the site is not intended for make-believe drawings, these things can go in the super forum if you’d like I suppose, but label it as make believe don’t try to act like this is a serious discussion, please John |
Post# 1212549 , Reply# 35   8/19/2024 at 07:35 (241 days old) by chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 1    
![]() @ John- cite the forum rules stating personally made or fair use drawings, pictures, re-productions, schematics, cycles, or modifications pertaining to vintage appliances shall not be posted or discussed on AW.org.
@Johnb300m:
I've got 3 BOL cycle sequences that use only 8.8 gallons of water- however unless you pre-rinse your dishes well I highly doubt you'd want to use any of these three cycles or have the same water going around for 30+ minutes even though you would probably still get good results with the Power Clean Filter Module. IMO you need extra water for pre-washing and pre-rinsing excessive soils associated with dishware that has not been pre-rinsed.
Variant one, long heated rinse for best drying-
Variant two, shortened rinse-
Variant three, long main wash for baked on soils, no time given for building thermal inertia in the rinse, heated dry increased by 6 minutes to compensate-
Jerome let me know what you think and what you approve of.
|
Post# 1212575 , Reply# 36   8/19/2024 at 12:17 (241 days old) by GELaundry4ever ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
I like them all. |
Post# 1212579 , Reply# 37   8/19/2024 at 12:58 (241 days old) by chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() I worked hard on them, even had to do the math. My head hurts LOL. I'm glad you like and approve of them, that means a lot to me.
I think one of the best things would be getting rid of the thermal hold for a fixed period of heated time in both the prewash, mainwash and final rinse. This lets the water temps exceed 140*F, giving that true Potscrubber performance. It also increases reliability as I've read online threads where Power Clean timers would fail by stalling out at the thermal hold and not advance even when temperatures were satisfied. Ditching all the thermal hold wiring and switching to an energy efficient low vibration permanent split capacitor motor frees up contacts in both the 6 and 8 contact row timers for things like various indicator lights and staggered timed heat. A cycling contact can provide intermittent heat for China washes while a long duration close contact can provide Pot and Pans heating as similarly done with high end dura-wash dishwashers to achieve normal vs hi-temp options. Much less to go wrong.
Option buttons will control heat, knob will control the number fills for MOL and up models. |
Post# 1212604 , Reply# 38   8/19/2024 at 16:43 (241 days old) by qsd-dan (West)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 2    
![]()
Eh, thermal hold is a great idea, just make the components more robust so they don't fail as easy. I'm assuming it's the contacts that fail from being burned/pitted.
Thermal hold to 150F for wash cycles, final sani rinse 180F. That should be hardwired in and not de-selectable. A 180F final rinse eliminates the need for heated dry. Pop the door open after draining in the final rinse water and flash dry. |
Post# 1212641 , Reply# 39   8/20/2024 at 03:55 (240 days old) by chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 1    
![]() Alright Dan, now you've done it. 30 minute heated rinse! I'm still including a dry, I like my dishware baked!
The thing is water coming already hot (+145*F) will trigger a short main wash (12 minutes) when the time needed to scour dish and bake-ware (30-40 minutes) would provide ample time to heat the water as it is.
I feel like thermal holds were a way of the past by not penalizing users who had hot water. Those with 150*F tanks could still enjoy normal cycle times or at least normal for that period of time.
A 150*F thermal hold followed by a 180*F thermal would require two thermostats, or one stat with a bias heater further complicating things. Robustness is a key ingredient in any appliance, however simplicity will always take it to the next level eliminating at least one more thing that can go wrong when millions of machines are in use. Small 0.001% problems become problems on a grand scale. Also ff something does go wrong (like the heater giving out) there is no fail safe as the machine will run indefinitely until manually stopped. Personally I really don't like the concept of breaking busses in the timer, re-feeding, extraneous switching or stalling the timer based on external inputs.
I've always like GE's approach. They moved away from temperature sensing based water heating on their EM models and built the time into the main wash and rinse cycles. I like the idea of the timer being absolute, at the top running above all else switched across the line by a single contact having the final say in any cycle sequence.
This post was last edited 08/20/2024 at 06:46 |
Post# 1212643 , Reply# 40   8/20/2024 at 06:31 (240 days old) by Chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 1    
![]() I like GE's latter model Potscrubber water heating system the best. The timer runs continually through out the entire cycle, being at the top of the circuit switched by only one master timer contact (0M-0T) that does not open until the timer advance out of the dry period. Where a thermal hold would normally be present, GE uses a 29 minute delayed timer increment with a dedicated "Wet Heat" 4M-4T water heating contact. This contact is hard wired and can not be over-ridden, mimicking a forced thermal hold. If extra heat is desired to obtain water hotter than normal, achievable by selecting "Potscrubber" or "Water Heat", 10 minutes of heat is added around the delayed increment, in the first pre wash and in the final rinse for a true high temp wash experience. Depressing "Water Heat" closes push-button contacts 9-10 and 14-15 connecting the water heat light and supplementary 6M-6T "Heat Boost" contact to the heating element circuit. This illuminates the water heat light every time the heating element is energized letting the user know tub water is being heated much the same way some Whirlpool dishwashers illuminated a heating delay light when doing a thermal hold.
In any case all cycles have a long 40 or 43 minute main wash regardless of the incoming water temperature. Heating temperatures and cycles are achieved by the amount of time the heater is engaged in the cycle rather than the amount of time the timer is stalled. Just my preference.
TOL Dura wash machines use a similar concept.
As an example a TOL GE built Amana:
|
Post# 1212644 , Reply# 41   8/20/2024 at 07:29 (240 days old) by Chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 1    
![]() This is another water heating system I really like and I wish was used on the Power Clean Modules. Pots&Pans and Hi-Temp wash is achieved by adding heat at various parts of the cycle. For example, contact 6 provides 24 minutes of mandatory water heating in the main wash, 80 seconds of mandatory watering heat in the first post main wash rinse and 5.3 minutes of mandatory water heating in the final rinse. Depressing Pots & Pans connects timer contact 7 to the heating element circuit providing 5 minutes 20 seconds of water heating through the first pre wash. This heat differentiates the same number of water change outs between being classed as "Pots and Pans" vs "Heavy Wash" Depressing push-button "Hi-Temp Wash" connects timer contact 8 to the heating element circuit providing 2 minutes 40 seconds of water heating in the main wash and 8 minutes of water heating in the final rinse.
Interesting concept I'd like to see stretched. Having the number of water change outs and time dictated by the user selection of the dial, while an array of options like "Pots and Pans" "Heavy" "Normal" "Light" "Low energy" "China Crystal" "Hi-Temp Wash" and "Hi-Temp Rinse" would dictate the amount of heat added to the Prewash, Main Wash and Final Rinse.
|
Post# 1212724 , Reply# 44   8/21/2024 at 15:59 (239 days old) by chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() @Lavamat_Jon: What happens to all the food solids in your machine? Is there a macerator? Don't take this the wrong way but I can't picture these UK machines passing a cake test like the Power Cleans could. Or be as easy to service. Or as long lasting.
I do thank you for the backed on pan coming out clean. That does sway my opinion in favor of your machine- you have proved that your machine is capable of scrubbing. |
Post# 1212736 , Reply# 45   8/21/2024 at 17:28 (239 days old) by Maytag85 (Sean A806)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 4    
![]() |
Post# 1212741 , Reply# 46   8/21/2024 at 17:52 (239 days old) by Chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 1212761 , Reply# 48   8/22/2024 at 05:23 (238 days old) by chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() Correct me if I'm wrong, it sounds like there are food bits at the bottom of the dishwasher at the end of the cycle. Without a macerator, the drain pump can only accept food bits up to a certain size- the rest has to be separated out. Whats left sits on top of the grate. Filters should not need cleaning either, it is the job of the dishwashers to be self cleaning for life.
In the Power Clean filter module unless a person wittingly decides not to scrap whole slices of food or intentionally places large unbreakable chunks of food into the dishwasher, food bits slip through the almost grape sized tub protruding louvers encircling the mechanism where they are then pulled into a beefy 1/3 HP (500 watt plus +++) 3450 rpm macerator and ground up into fine particles. A good portion of the water is then pumped into the filter chamber where the ground food accumulates and settles while water exits out through the fine filter. Holes at the bottom of the wash arm spray downward washing the fine filter squares preventing food soils from clogging them or permanently sticking to them. At drain, the filter chamber is pumped out directly- settled soils can not in any way migrate back into the tub- all accumulated soil in the chamber leaves through the machines drain hose and into the homes plumbing. The soil chamber is huge and can hold a LOT of food soil- soil from the worse cases of food bits stuck to every dish possible. In a EU machine I can just imagine the fine filter becoming totally clogged into the main wash. The Power Clean Filter Module stops just short of an insink garbage disposer.
To give you an idea, here is a disassembly of a late model US Power Clean Filter Module. What the vid doesn't do full justice or show how much area volume is inside the soil chamber.
The whole mechanism being changed out in the Kitchen Aid version- I like the big motor and pump size
To get this true self cleaning, true none pre-rinsing design to work you're going to need a bit of water to maximize its full potential.
CLICK HERE TO GO TO chetlaham's LINK |
Post# 1212764 , Reply# 50   8/22/2024 at 07:10 (238 days old) by chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() Those dishes have to be going in relatively clean or with relatively little soil load to produce the results you describe. I can't imagine detergent being able to dissolve bigger food bits let along in large quantities.
A macerator is a necessary part in every aspect including saving energy. You should not rely on manual clean filters or sump grates- particles need to be ground up, separated, and then flushed down the drain in the same load. Anything less will force loading pre-prep which significantly increases energy use.
Perhaps what you see as dishwasher mis-use is actually the right way to use a dishwasher and I could see how you came to that inference when your design might not allow for proper soil handling. You're simply altering your patterns until the machine you're using produces the great cleaning results you want to see. Coming to the conclusion this is normal and acceptable based on the reduction of energy use. It is no secret the the soil soiled dishes are going into a machine the less water is required to clean them inside the machine.
Granted I'm not there as I have not witnessed or experienced what you have experienced. So I could be wrong. At the same time I do know that when Americans including myself switched to tall tubs the results were not the same as their or my Power Clean Module. A friend of mind even had his spray arm tall tub holes clog.
Only acceptable luck I've ever had with a tall tub is my former MDB Maytag and currently near identical Maytag MDB7979SHZ0 which is based on the Power Clean Filter Module design. It has a macerator, self cleaning fine filter, and can use up to 16 gallons of water with the right options and soil sensing inputs.
https://s3.amazonaws.com/sm-backend-production-attachments/instruction-sheet-w11172665a.pdf
I sure hope you're dishwasher's soil sensor would modify the cycle to 16 gallons of water if the load was dirty enough. Please tell me it can.
CLICK HERE TO GO TO chetlaham's LINK |
Post# 1212765 , Reply# 51   8/22/2024 at 07:32 (238 days old) by Maytag85 (Sean A806)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]()
While it is possible to use as little resources as possible, it is often poorly executed these days. Seems companies these days just like to GM-ification everything, good idea, good layout, terribly executed.
I’ll put it this way and it may be an apples to oranges comparison, but here it goes. Say for example, you have an old Ford truck from the 1990’s with the 300 inline 6 with a cast iron timing gear, simple proven pushrod OHV design. May not be extremely efficient, but continues to run and run and run forever. Then, you upgrade to a newer Ford truck with the Ecoboost V6 which gets good fuel mileage, but here’s one thing they don’t mention in the fine print. Every so often, the timing chains and phasers and glides have to be replaced, intake valves have to be cleaned since there’s carbon buildup do to the GDI design, among other things. What ends up being saved on fuel costs will be spent on repair costs, it’s all fun and games until something more efficient ends up nickel and diming you in repairs that aren’t repaired on something older. While the old Ford truck from the 1990’s gets mediocre mileage, it’ll continue to run and run with little maintenance, only things it will need is fluid changes. As the saying goes: “If it’s too good to be true, then it probably is”. |
Post# 1212767 , Reply# 52   8/22/2024 at 07:47 (238 days old) by Combo52 ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 5    
![]()
Hi Chet, I don’t know why you keep going on about power clean dishwashers. They’re not making them any anymore. They’re never going to make them again, everybody knows it was a wonderful dishwasher. I have three of them in my two homes.
As a repair person that deals with people and their appliances every day, one thing is universal. Everybody loves their new dishwashers among my customers. It doesn’t matter whether it’s a Bosch, Maytag KitchenAid, etc. etc. universally very happy with the results of their dishwashers. There are many testimonials on this site from people who are very critical of dishwashers and yet they love their new machines. Look at the rave reviews on the new Maytag rack how much Bob loves his Bosch dishwasher in Texas Almost everybody says they’ve never had such clean dishes. The great majority of people in this world want their appliances to use less energy less water and make less noise. Dishwasher manufactures amazing job on these three things machines also continue to be quite durable. you have to remember historically back in the 60s and 70s there were lots of dishwashers that didn’t last five years in the United States and yes, there are dishwashers today that don’t last five years I have thrown away three Samsung dishwashers that were under three years old in the last month, for example. The KitchenAid dishwashers of old here in the United States from the 50s through the 80s were incredibly well built dishwashers. However, the most frequent service call we got on them was not cleaning well they were all kinds of things would go wrong with them that needed attention. nothing has changed. Modern dishwashers can have problems to. Reply 51 hi Sean yes you’re definitely getting into apples and oranges when you bring in a 1990s Ford truck into the comparison, however, those engines really didn’t last that long and they made so much pollution and use so much fuel that nobody would even drive them today. When I was working for Domino’s service in 1979, they gave me a brand new Ford van with the 306 cylinder and an automatic transmission, that engine had to be rebuilt because of a failure of one of the cylinders by the time it had 37,000 miles on it things were not that well built in those days, even though it was a rugged engine in principle it really wasn’t that great. And there was no warranty on it like today, the new Pacifica. I just bought has six years and 60,000 mile warranty on it with no extra charge. Manufactures know that things are much better today and they’re willing to give long warranties. John Modern cars are easily lasting 100 200 250,000 miles if you take care of them and all the while they’re producing 1/60 of the pollution so it’s really not a bad thing if the vehicle needs to be recycled after 20 years. |
Post# 1212771 , Reply# 54   8/22/2024 at 08:40 (238 days old) by chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 1    
![]() So John, why don't you ditch your Power Cleans for a modern tall tub? You claim modern tall tubs clean even better with less water, noise and energy. So why not do the right thing and save the planet? You can even hand your Power Cleans over to me since I don't mind noise, water and less clean dishes.
Dishwasher longevity and reliability peaked in 1983 to 1991 especially with the introduction of the GE Perma-Tuff Potscrubber which was the pinnacle of it all.
Other than those being forced into using modern machines I have no doubt there is a substantial number of folks who like the increase in capacity and quietness tall tubs offer on the premise most of the dishware cleaning is already done beforehand. The inability of tall tubs and manual clean filter system to handle food bits does not make itself known to the user. You have to realize that, tragically, a large number of the population has grown up with dishwashers without fine filters, no or insufficient main wash heating, broken macerators, deliberately shortened main wash times, insufficient water change outs, short cycle times, poor water distribution, no upper wash arm (I'm excluding GE's pop up tower here), no power shower, bargain dish-washing detergents, hard water, undersized detergent cups, or a combination of all these things which has permanently conditioned people to pre wash and pre-prep their dishware to varying yet significant degrees.
Prerinsed dishware isn't going to matter in a tall tub, of course people will see whats next that being reduced noise and the feel good of perceived energy savings deriving hedonic fulfillment from these gains.
The Power Clean on the other hand with reasonable time, enough hot water and good detergent will out clean anything being able to provide a true level minimal dish prep. Scrape, load, and wash. You should not even have to pre-treat pots and pans. Load and wash. Water should never touch the vast majority of dishware prior to turning the machine on. The WP PC is capable of doing just that. As all dishwashers should.
|
Post# 1212773 , Reply# 55   8/22/2024 at 09:10 (238 days old) by chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() @Lavamat: I have no doubt your dishwasher cleaned that bake pan, loaded as is. However, you have an excellent example of soil removal from just one surface, not soil handling and or soil elimination of the machine itself. All that pan does is turn the water red/brown in color. (forgive my cynical nature here)
Soil handling and soil elimination comes in three parts:
1) being able to load a used salad bowl and cooked on egg in a stainless pan and not have any of the food bits be at the bottom of the machine at the end of the cycle and not have any of it be in the fine filter of the machine.
2) How would your dishwasher adapt or handle every single plate, pan, bowl, dish, cup and utensil looking like that bake pan inside and out under an extreme Bobload condition? Would there be enough water to carry away all that soil? Would there be enough water use and change outs in the cycle such that the final rinse water is crystal clear, clean enough to drink without flavor, minus rinse aid? (forgive my analogy)
3) The ability to stop macerated particles from ending up on surfaces at the end of the cycle. This is where the final filter comes in, and from what I'm seeing both your machine, my machine and a Power Clean module do that with excellence so I think we can all agree on #3 being superb.
I used to cook most of my meals from scratch, but after buying a Sharp R-21LCFS commercial microwave oven experiencing profoundly even cooking without splatter, drying, burning, or temperature gradients at full 1000 watts of output power along with its understandable easy to use nature I became deeply smittened switching over entirely canned, frozen and pre-made meals. The time savings, ease, convince, tasty and congenial outcome has me psychologically addicted.
As of late that is changing primarily because of farmer markets I've started to cook some of my own meals again relying less on my microwave oven.
|
Post# 1212776 , Reply# 56   8/22/2024 at 09:34 (238 days old) by chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() Here is my dishwasher. On normal without options it uses 3 gallons of water, but on Powerblast with options and food soil it can go well above 9 gallons.
16 gallons is not wasteful at all when its required. Whirlpool seems to think so, and I can understand why. You need water to carry soil away.
Despite everything it still can not outperform the Power Clean Filter Module but does perform well over all.
No filter to clean.
|
Post# 1212780 , Reply# 58   8/22/2024 at 09:59 (238 days old) by chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() Do you have pictures and a model # to your Miele?
My Maytag dishwasher has both a macerator and fine filter.
I can't picture a machine being able to seriously clean without either.
Yes food gobs that are to big to go through the Power Clean louvers have to be picked out by hand but that should be very rare- big bits should be scrapped off. The rest is handled well by the power clean. I can't see many medium sized bits of food that can get into a Power Clean leaving a Miele. |
Post# 1212790 , Reply# 60   8/22/2024 at 10:20 (238 days old) by chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 1212793 , Reply# 62   8/22/2024 at 10:42 (238 days old) by chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 1    
![]() Interesting.
How many gallons of water for each cycle? Is there a soil sensor? My model has a turbidity sensor that sends light through the water to determine how the cycle should progress. Poor light shine through indicates the need for more water change outs and loner cycle times.
My motor is an across the line PSC, with food chopper.
Here is the motor, both wash arms run at the same time including the top sprayer:
|
Post# 1212794 , Reply# 63   8/22/2024 at 10:48 (238 days old) by DaveAMKrayoGuy ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() Clean mine, too--and what a difference it makes when I don't have things that have to be rewashed...
Put on gloves of course, and have to bear with removing stuff that looks like I just ate often after I just ate (yeeeccchhh!!!!)...
So, no, no dishwasher other than some having a built-in scrap grinder designed to pulverize small particles of food, a dishwasher is not a food-waste disposal...
Success speaks for itself--and that is mine never gets clogged up and full of water from any of the gunk I really am led to believe a dishwasher is capable of getting off--none really is!!!!
I remove my own threatening amounts, and in short, everything gets clean...
-- Dave |
Post# 1212796 , Reply# 64   8/22/2024 at 10:53 (238 days old) by chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 1    
![]() |
Post# 1212802 , Reply# 67   8/22/2024 at 11:10 (238 days old) by Maytag85 (Sean A806)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 3    
![]()
I believe the Ford 306 was a completely different engine than the 300 inline 6.
The 300 inline 6 started out life as the 240 inline 6 when it debuted in 1965, sometime in the 70’s the displacement was increased to 300 ci. Was such an indestructible engine, was even used for marine applications such as industrial generator engines, water pump engines etc. During the cash for clunkers program in 2009, they drained the oil out of many 300 inline sixes to kill them off, literally kept on running without any oil for several minutes, several attempts later, still kept running, they eventually gave up on trying to kill them off. Maybe I should create a thread in the Super forum index in the future about the longest running engines of all time. |
Post# 1212804 , Reply# 68   8/22/2024 at 11:19 (238 days old) by chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 1    
![]() I'd really like to try your machines out with your detergent and your softened water. Its possible they may actually achieve great results with true prep-less loading. Being honest I am skeptical as your machines are different from anything I've known to achieve great results. So I'll remain humble on this one, its only fair and logical thing to do. I am not about ego, but rather performance so I'll take your word albeit still be skeptical on my part.
There are two things however we may have to disagree on potentially:
How water and energy are used is trivial in terms of production. There are forums of energy which are essentially free and so abundant they make end use conservation irrelevant. With our modern production of water and energy the impact conservation makes is almost non existent. I don't want to derail this thread so I will leave it at that.
Looking at the wiring, programming and construction of EU machines makes them more complicated than many US machines, especially older US machines. Complexity only creates longevity and serviceability problems for the end user even if it saves a lot of energy.
|
Post# 1212805 , Reply# 69   8/22/2024 at 11:38 (238 days old) by Combo52 ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 1212814 , Reply# 71   8/22/2024 at 14:33 (238 days old) by chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() Out of all the the tall tub dishwashers I've researched and owned the Maytag MDB series is by far the best I've ever used. By far. The cycle will adapt significantly to soil adding water, change outs, purges, time and heat as needed. No stinginess. The motor labelled 0.18 HP, small, but still more powerful than most modern tall tubs. There is a soft food chopper that grinds thing well. And of course excellent fine filtration. It is the best tall tub dishwasher Whirlpool has ever made and then some.
www.repairclinic.com/PartDetail/...
Can you quote the manual I posted or show me what two filters need cleaning? I've never cleaned anything. The metal shield is crimped in place. My understanding is you are not supposed to touch the mechanism as its 100% self cleaning. No smells or stink either.
Overall I am happy with my Maytag, it is the second best thing next to a Power Clean Module and I'm not taking anything for granted as time has taught me. My biggest mistake was leaving the Power Clean behind at the old place. Dumb, because even back in the 2000s I had an understanding of what dishwashers were good and what weren't. By the time I wised up and went looking to buy a new Power Clean they were already out of production. |
Post# 1212816 , Reply# 72   8/22/2024 at 14:40 (238 days old) by chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 1    
![]() This is my second Maytag MDB, the first one I had a while back was even quieter than this one had the silk gliding rail which Whirlpool has since discontinued. The plastic retainers began failing and the that ball bearings began popping out falling into the sump and eventually the macerator where they would make noise. Eventually the rail broke apart and the top rack kept falling into the lower rack. I had to rip tie the broken rail in place rendering the top rack unusable. That and the amount of ball bearings the pump had swallowed (at least three dozen) drove me to buy a near identical machine new but without the satin glide racks. The new model has a long heated dry option which is great. |
Post# 1212862 , Reply# 74   8/23/2024 at 04:47 (237 days old) by chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 1    
![]() Thanks for the compliment!
Ah, OK, I see now what you're doing. Yes the module can be taken apart if something gets inside or becomes cruddy.
Personally I've never cleaned the power module. I just load, use one or two Cascade Platinum plus pods one in the main detergent drawer and one in the silverware basket for cooked on loads/cruddy loads. Great results.
Keep your dishwashers in service as long as you can. This is probably the second best dishwasher ever produced in existence. It is reasonably durable, sturdy, tough racks, flexible loading, great scrubbing, soil handling, quiet, long heated dry and the turbidity sensor will add as much heat and water as reasonably needed to get the load spotless.
I don't know why folks here are showing show much disapproval over water consumption. Yes this machine can get a load of fully pre-rinsed dishes clean with only 3 gallons of water. However when you load batter, grease and mashed potato caked on loads along with week old plates the extra water change outs make all the difference in the world.
On other thing worth mentioning. I don't use rinse-aid. Despite this glasses dry streak and spot free. This dishwasher is definitely Whirlpools top 10 best products. |
Post# 1212871 , Reply# 75   8/23/2024 at 10:15 (237 days old) by DADoES ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 5    
![]() |
Post# 1212881 , Reply# 76   8/23/2024 at 12:48 (237 days old) by chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
This post has been removed by the member who posted it. |
Post# 1212882 , Reply# 77   8/23/2024 at 12:53 (237 days old) by chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 1    
![]() @Dadoes: I think we will have to agree to disagree. The edible food being "tossed" in is how dishes are supposed to be prepped- very minimally. Bowls, pans, saucers, ect will always have bits food stuck to them- sometimes more than others depending on the sauce or how clingy the food bits are. It is not practical to remove every piece unless you want to waste time, water or both.
The comments on the video in post #73 describe a common problem encountered by Americans- grunge build-up due to insufficient food particle management in modern dishwashers.
Before anyone say this is only the result of dishwasher misuse I encourage you to read Post# 941638 in this thread:
We know how John loads his dishwashers. Unlike most Americans John had the option of going back to a dishwasher that actually works. Other Americans don't have that option tiring of the constant smells/grunge/cleaning/service calls and just switch to pre-rinsing dishes wasting on orders of magnitude more water than any dishwasher has ever used.
View Full Size
|
Post# 1212896 , Reply# 79   8/23/2024 at 15:41 (237 days old) by CHETLAHAM ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 1    
![]() @Maytaga806: Yes, I have the same issue. The dispenser is completely filled with water and the detergent tab is fully dissolved. There are even suds in the pre-rinse water. Sadly I've used many dishwashers where the dispenser becomes completely filled with water including latter model GE.
Whirlpool standard tubs got it right, they had a seal all the way around the main detergent lid, and the latch would force the lid to stay firmly down.
|
Post# 1212899 , Reply# 80   8/23/2024 at 16:20 (237 days old) by maytaga806 (Howell, Michigan)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 2    
I know right? My portable Powerclean doesn’t even get a hint of moisture during the pre wash in the closed cup, keeps it nicely in tact til it’s time to pop open. Glad we’re not the only ones. |
Post# 1212901 , Reply# 81   8/23/2024 at 16:41 (237 days old) by neptunebob (Pittsburgh, PA)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 2    
![]() Most of the problems everyone refers to here will not exist.
My MIL is 89 and lives alone in her family house and years ago had a very expensive KitchenAid dishwasher installed there. It did have the porcelain tub so must have been soon after the Whirlpool takeover.
Recently my sister and her husband went to her house and found the dishwasher stunk of high heaven. Some of the other neighbors came over and took the machine apart and cleaned the filters and they were all full of gross gunk. How did it get that way?
My sister asked "Alice" where she kept the Cascade or Finish and she didn't know, it turns out Alice ran the machine without detergent at all.
Her water heater was also turned down so that it was barely warm enough for a shower.
She stocked Alice up with paper plates and utensils, bought some detergent and turned up the water heater some (telling Alice she did that and be careful), hopefully the odors will not come back.
Oh, and Alice did pre rinse (It seems like mostly women do this) using a lot of water and since she is on septic there were wet spots in the back yard. |
Post# 1212904 , Reply# 82   8/23/2024 at 16:57 (237 days old) by chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 1    
![]() You're not the only one. Modern dishwasher detergent dispensers suck.
The Power Clean could hold you through a pre wash thermal hold, and then dispense nice, fresh detergent for the main wash. A true marvel. The Power Clean was a perfected design in almost every way possible, a timeless classic. It could have easily stayed in production for decades more. If everyone was like me the Power Clean would in 95% of all Kitchens with Hobart Kitchen Aid type construction. Available in Polymer, Stainless Steal and Porcelain on Steal from BOLs all the way up to TOL models. Single cycle dispenser-less entry level machines all the way up to deluxe multi cycle LCD control tri dispenser multi orbital wash arm models and everything in between. Indestructible metal screw on drain check valve assembly. The module and motor would be a regularly replaceable item stocked in stores and online- as common as the direct drive motor coupler. Molex plug wire harness such that different timers, cycle fascias, escutcheons, ect can be adapted to almost any machine.
The world would simply stop prewashing dishes and at 11 gallons of water per cycle on average water consumption would drop dramatically compared to modern tall tubs. |
Post# 1212950 , Reply# 83   8/24/2024 at 00:53 (237 days old) by neptunebob (Pittsburgh, PA)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 1212965 , Reply# 84   8/24/2024 at 09:35 (236 days old) by chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 1212969 , Reply# 85   8/24/2024 at 10:38 (236 days old) by cfz2882 (Belle Fourche,SD)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
no detergent and insufficient water temp :) |
Post# 1212972 , Reply# 86   8/24/2024 at 10:55 (236 days old) by chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 1    
![]() |
Post# 1212974 , Reply# 87   8/24/2024 at 11:02 (236 days old) by DADoES ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 1213014 , Reply# 88   8/25/2024 at 00:09 (236 days old) by GELaundry4ever ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
Modern dishwashers seem to have weak sprays, forcing them to run longer. In addition, dishwasher detergents and rinse aids have fragrance because food tends to stink up the dishwasher. My Bosch/Kenmore will smell like whatever food I've eaten, from blueberry pancakes and coffee to shrimp Alfredo casserole. Finish ultimate takes care of that. |
Post# 1213029 , Reply# 89   8/25/2024 at 08:15 (235 days old) by chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() Jerome, your observations are correct. To wash dishes you need four things:
1) Mechanical energy
2) Chemical energy
3) Thermal energy
4) Time
When one or more of these are reduced others must be increased to compensate. Exception for enzymes which work in stages over time. This is why modern dishwashers spend so much time washing and rinsing to compensate for weak low pressure, low volume sprays and low thermal hold satisfaction points.
Modern dishwashers simply do not use enough water, and do not have the macerators, filters or large enough pumps to properly capture, grind, collect and carry away food soils. Soils accumulate within the internal parts of the machine accumulating and begining to smell over time. Modern dishwashers are not practical or capable in residential applications.
People did not know what they had with the Power Clean Filter module and Maytag Jetclean. Even commercial dish machines with motors 1HP and over are not meant to handle un-preped dishes as food bits just accumulate on top of the sump strainer. Commercial machines are meant to be used for fine cleaning and sanitation.
https://www.jacksonwws.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/DishStar-LT-Operation-Guide.pdf
Unlike a restaurant, residential users typically have the luxury of waiting an hour for their machines to complete a cycle- enough time for a machine to do pre-rinsing, scouring, coarse cleaning, soil roundup, automatic filter cleaning in addition to fine cleaning and sanitation. There is no reason why users must complete 5 steps prior to turning on their machines in order to have civilized results- ie not having stink over time. |
Post# 1223984 , Reply# 90   2/9/2025 at 19:06 by GELaundry4ever ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
Perhaps Speed Queen Dishwashers can use these enormous pumps for power, efficiency and effectiveness. |
Post# 1223992 , Reply# 91   2/9/2025 at 20:21 by chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |