Thread Number: 93038  /  Tag: Ranges, Stoves, Ovens
Appliances: The Future is Battery Powered
[Down to Last]

automaticwasher.org's exclusive eBay Watch:
scroll >>> for more items --- [As an eBay Partner, eBay may compensate automaticwasher.org if you make a purchase using any link to eBay on this page]
Post# 1176500   3/29/2023 at 22:10 (393 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

This article appeared yesterday in The Washington Post. Since this is usually behind a paywall, I did a complete copy and paste for all to enjoy. 

 

This may be the true beginning of the end for gas stoves.

 

Your stove is the first appliance to get a battery, but not the last

Your appliances, you should know, will come loaded with batteries. We’ll probably have energy storage in our stoves and water heaters, perhaps even our washers and dryers.

Traditionally, batteries’ main purpose was to make gadgets portable. Today, they’re emerging as a shortcut on our path to “electrify everything.”

 

To switch from fossil fuels, we’ll need to plug in a bunch of new things: our cars, our stoves, our heaters and more. Many homes were not designed to carry this kind of load. Installing high-voltage wires, upgrading panels and rewiring your connection to utility poles is like building an electric highway into your home when all you have is a country road.

 
 

These retrofits are expensive — if you can find someone to do them, given the crush of new demand. Instead of rewiring our homes and upgrading grid infrastructure, appliances with batteries will allow us to stash energy around the house for when we need it, eliminating a final barrier to stop burning natural gas and heating oil inside our homes.

This is one of our best shots to decarbonize existing buildings. In the transportation and electricity sector, only a few hundred companies, automakers and utilities, must change their practices to phase out fossil fuels. But tamping down buildings’ emissions requires millions of individual households and property owners to make expensive, unfamiliar investments.

 

Little batteries are here to help.

Induction stoves

Induction stoves are the first major appliances to come with batteries. While a standard 120-volt plug can handle most daily cooking routines, running an electric oven and four burners draws a blistering 10 kilowatts, equivalent to more than 10 space heaters running full blast simultaneously. To handle that much juice, if only for a few minutes, you need a 240-volt outlet, like the ones for clothes dryers or conventional electric ovens.

Millions of homes do not have one, especially in the kitchen. In my own 1940s condominium, my electrician estimated running the wiring for a 240-volt outlet for an induction stove will cost $3,800. Battery-enabled stoves avoid this by plugging into an existing 120-volt outlet. When a burst of electricity is needed, the battery discharges energy. No new wiring necessary.

These little batteries are not quite here yet. For now, no major manufacturers are integrating batteries into their appliances. Rheem, a global water heater manufacturer, released the first 120-volt water heater heat pump last year, although it doesn’t include energy storage.

But start-ups are rushing into this space.

 

San Francisco-based Impulse Labs plans to sell its first battery-enabled induction stove in the next year or so. Its 3-kilowatt-hour battery packs enough electricity to roast a Thanksgiving turkey with all the fixings, or cook three meals during a blackout, says founder Sam D’Amico. Channing Street Copper will ship its full-range Charlie model later this year for $5,999 before incentives. Charlie offers the option to plug other appliances into the stove, like your refrigerator or phone, as backup power. Both appliances use batteries to supplement, rather than replace, electricity from the 120-volt outlet. The batteries’ lithium iron phosphate chemistry is more stable and environmentally friendly than traditional lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles or phones.

Neither is aimed at the lower end of the market, even after generous rebates. But both start-ups say prices will come down, and for people wanting to have backup power storage in their home, it will be much cheaper to buy plug-in-ready batteries within appliances than installing stand-alone energy storage. By some estimates, it is 3 to 10 times more expensive to install equipment like home batteries, compared to the batteries themselves. Eventually, these companies plan to integrate their customers’ batteries into massive networks that represent many megawatts of flexible energy storage.

“We won’t stop at doing stoves,” says D’Amico. “You’ll get a number of appliances, and all of them will come with appropriately sized batteries. As you incrementally electrify your house, you get incremental energy storage. It’s like getting a Tesla Powerwall without ever getting a Powerwall.”

Backing up your home grid

Little affordable batteries could help countries leapfrog into a renewable future, rather than wait for utilities to invest billions of dollars in new transmission, better home connections and energy storage.

Right now, your appliances use little energy for most of the day. Yet each morning and evening, your home’s energy use spikes when water heaters click on or the oven fires up. Multiply this intense burst of electricity by millions of appliances. You can see the problem.

In the United Kingdom, there’s a name for this phenomenon: the kettle surge. During breaks in popular TV programs, millions of electric kettles turn on at once, leading to a massive, destabilizing surge of demand. To meet it, a dedicated “grid energy balancing” team at the national utility uses computer models to forecast electricity consumption, even tracking popular TV dramas. A standard soap opera episode might imply an extra 300 megawatts of power during breaks, but if a main character dies during the episode, the audience might need 600 megawatts or more.

Smoothing out spikes like this means the U.K. must run power plants on standby, or import huge volumes of energy from mainland Europe.

But small batteries could step up to the plate.

Stoves, heat pumps, washers and dryers. Even kettles. At a national scale, these could soak up cheap power when renewables are plentiful, and dispatch it during the peak hours in the mornings and evenings when electricity supplies are tight. As people swap gas for electricity, and less consistent wind and solar energy comes online, this will only become more valuable. It will help manage spikes — and maybe even earn you money from selling power to the grid or dodging peak electricity prices.

Energy companies and appliance manufacturers like Impulse and Channing Street Copper are already vying to manage the megawatts of power stored in millions of appliances.

 

It seems like a clear climate win. But since battery manufacturing is so energy-intensive, it’s not clear if installing so many batteries guarantees lower overall emissions. “It’s an open question still whether or not getting batteries into the home is on its face a decarbonization strategy,” Wyatt Merrill, who works on building electrification at the Department of Energy, told the climate podcast Volts. “It definitely has the potential to be. But when you think about the entire life cycle of mining lithium and developing the batteries and shipping them around, you really have a hole to dig out of.”

Still, economic forces may usher in a world of little batteries everywhere faster than we think. Priced at more than $10,000, large stationary batteries like Tesla Powerwalls — another solution to support a clean grid — remain too expensive for many homes. With utilities imposing time-of-use rates and curtailing homeowners’ ability to sell solar electricity back to the grid, storage in your home will only become more valuable.

Kyri Baker, an assistant professor of engineering at the University of Colorado at Boulder, says these new appliances can deliver low-cost energy storage at home while building the grid’s capacity to absorb clean, excess energy.

“It’s going to be a game changer,” says Baker. “It really makes financial sense to absorb this [electricity] locally. The best way is to let appliances do it.”

 

 

 

 

 



CLICK HERE TO GO TO Ultramatic's LINK

  View Full Size



Post# 1176510 , Reply# 1   3/29/2023 at 23:51 (393 days old) by bradfordwhite (central U.S.)        

bradfordwhite's profile picture
Oh yes. It's already here.
Look at tools.
My neumatic (air powered) nailers are "outdated". People are retiring their air compressors, hoses, extension cords, and air tools
and getting the same tools powered with batteries.

And we've previously discussed the full size GE 12 volt compressor refrigerator that RV manufacturers have switched to. That same unit is free standing and can be used in our homes and powered off a simple solar system if one chooses.

The thing with electric cars: they should all have solar panels built in and have an easy to switch out battery. The cars will most likely outlive the batteries. And the battery tech is constantly evolving.

If there were a network and people rented their battery, they could pull into a battery change station anytime (like a gas station), quickly switch out their drained battery for a fully charged one, and be on their way in just a few minutes.

I really think these electric cars that have fixed in place batteries are going to end up being least desirable.


  View Full Size
Post# 1176512 , Reply# 2   3/29/2023 at 23:59 (393 days old) by bradfordwhite (central U.S.)        
Really? Want to install a new light fixture somewhere

bradfordwhite's profile picture
but don't want to go through the trouble of putting in all the wires and switches?

Just screw the fixture to the wall and install a rechargable, dimmable, remote control bulb.

mindblowing.


CLICK HERE TO GO TO bradfordwhite's LINK


  View Full Size
Post# 1176529 , Reply# 3   3/30/2023 at 03:16 (393 days old) by henene4 (Heidenheim a.d. Brenz (Germany))        

I don't think this will be as popular as they make up.

Batteries are a wear point, they are expensive, they are difficult to handle.

I honestly wouldn't want to mix the hottest appliance in my house with batteries.



Even IF a wiring job is 1000-2000$ - the price of the battery addition is the same apparently?

Tools go battery powered because you move them constantly.
You don't move your oven every time you use it.

And comparing a battery operated appliance to a solar storage solution is very much missing the point.
The special sauce there is the integration.


Post# 1176537 , Reply# 4   3/30/2023 at 06:32 (393 days old) by combo52 (50 Year Repair Tech Beltsville,Md)        
Battery powered major appliances

combo52's profile picture
Interesting idea if they’ll be some limited use of it I’m sure, I don’t think you’ll see too many cooking appliances that are battery powered there’s just too much energy use there.

As for kettle surge in the UK, it might be time to retire those 3000 W tea kettles and go to 1500 W ones like we have in the US, I love the fast 3000 kettles and I have one that my old boss brought me back from the UK it’s blistering fast but it’s just not necessary to use that much power all at once.

Things like a water heater in a home using heat pump technology you can easily produce enough hot water for a family without batteries. It would be easy to program them to use off peak power and heat at night also.

John


Post# 1176543 , Reply# 5   3/30/2023 at 09:02 (393 days old) by petek (Ontari ari ari O )        

petek's profile picture
We've had numerous battery tools over the years from different makers and they have all ended up being tossed because of nla batteries. The restore here is littered with them as well, and not just cheap makes either. Same thing with a couple of cordless vacs that thankfully weren't that expensive to begin with.. Nowadays I don't buy anything cordless expecting it to last more than about 3 years tops before it heads to the landfill.

Post# 1176551 , Reply# 6   3/30/2023 at 11:27 (393 days old) by henene4 (Heidenheim a.d. Brenz (Germany))        
What a coincidence






At about 20:20

Still not sold about the idea.
Most induction cooktops over here have power management systems. You just tell the cooktop it can only use x amount of power at a time.

So you could limit your cooktop to just pull lets say 10A at a time.
Then it will actively manage what each burner is allowed to use.
You're only using 1 burner? That gets all the power.
You are using more? Then it gets split.

So as long as you run a 240V line, it's not necessary it's the full 30A or so.



I might be entirely wrong, but all houses in the US should have 240V service.
And even if is only 100A, smart power management etc. should make most anything possible with few exceptions.


So how much is running a new 240V line?
Is my guess of 1000-2000$ that far off in many cases?
Especially with the typical US construction type, that can't be much more than a one day task, right?


Post# 1176625 , Reply# 7   3/31/2023 at 02:39 (392 days old) by SudsMaster (SF Bay Area, California)        

sudsmaster's profile picture

From my experience, batteries are fine for lower power applications. But when push comes to shove, for major energy needs, there's nothing like a gas powered garden tool. As an example, the other day I used a battery powered lawn edger. It worked fine. But when I tried using the same motor for a weed whacker, it kept on stalling out. It wasn't because the battery was out of juice, either. It was because the line would wrap around this or that and cause the motor to shut down. Not good. Never had that problem with a gas powered motor.

 


Post# 1176628 , Reply# 8   3/31/2023 at 03:34 (392 days old) by qsd-dan (West)        

qsd-dan's profile picture

 But when push comes to shove, for major energy needs, there's nothing like a gas powered garden tool.

 

Agreed.


Post# 1176629 , Reply# 9   3/31/2023 at 04:33 (392 days old) by henene4 (Heidenheim a.d. Brenz (Germany))        

Again, I think power tools are a different thing.

You can get the same power in electric tools, corded or battery, as long as they are designed to deliver it.
That is generally more expensive than gas powered to do so, yes, so getting battery powered high power tools is exorbitant in many cases.

But, again, in many cases, you don't need that power.
Not saying YOU don't need that, but MANY cases don't need it.




And I just did some quick reading.

The few sources I looked at say that running the wiring is the cheaper part of everything, maybe 30$ per foot.
The outlet and breaker with installation are about 500$.

So as long as the kitchen and the panel aren't on the exact other side of the house, I don't see a battery powered cooker make much sense TBH.


Post# 1176631 , Reply# 10   3/31/2023 at 05:45 (392 days old) by foraloysius (Leeuwarden, Friesland, the Netherlands)        

foraloysius's profile picture
A battery powered cooker makes no sense at all to me. I see more future in whole house batteries. There's a plan for an experiment with storing electricity in the Thialf ice stadium to profit from cheaper electricity at certain hours of the day. Hopefully newer battery system like that will be developed in the future for consumer use so they are lighter and are able to store more energy. There are already a few systems, but we need cheaper and better.

www.treehugger.com/best-h...



Post# 1176634 , Reply# 11   3/31/2023 at 05:58 (392 days old) by Marky_mark (From Liverpool. Now living in Palm Springs and Dublin)        
Garden Tools

marky_mark's profile picture

Gasoline-powered leaf blowers have been banned in Palm Springs since about 3 years ago.  The gardeners initially switched to electric leaf blowers for about 2 weeks and then they reverted to using the banned gasoline-powered ones.  Why?  Well they told me that the electric one didn't have the power to do a good job.  Maybe that's because they bought a crap one.  Or maybe none of the electric ones are quite up to the job yet.  

 

https://www.palmspringsca.gov/services/sustainability-and-recycling/leaf-blower-ordinance-effective-2019


Post# 1176636 , Reply# 12   3/31/2023 at 06:23 (392 days old) by combo52 (50 Year Repair Tech Beltsville,Md)        
Battery powered yard, tools, etc.

combo52's profile picture
Work great, I’ve switched over completely. The only other thing I would use on my property or plug-in tools. I still have a few of those I completely got rid of anything gasoline powered years ago can’t stand the stinky dangerous equipment thousands of people are hurt every year with gasoline Yard tools.

I also hated every time I mowed the lawn with a gasoline mower that you have to come in and shower just to get all the stink off your body

Rich, you should get some new tools stuff that was made 10 and 20 years ago was not near as good .

The band gasoline blowers in DC two years ago. I’m sure there were some growing pains for the landscapers but they’re doing it and I haven’t seen anybody’s yard. That doesn’t look great.

Batteries can be good for very high powered items as anybody noticed that they make electric cars now with the equivalent many hundreds of horsepower, lol.

I agree that battery powered cooking equipment is probably not gonna be a very big thing. It’s too costly initially, but there will be a place for it in areas were power just isn’t available on demand,

John


Post# 1176641 , Reply# 13   3/31/2023 at 07:40 (392 days old) by gizmo (Victoria, Australia)        
battery garden tools, etc.

Whole house battery - I've been living off one for almost 20 years. Actually longer - the one I have now is nearing 20 years old. It has been looked after and not over-discharged, and is pretty much as good as new. I hope to get it to 25 or 30 years old before replacing it. Current one is lead-acid wet cells.

We have solar and are not connected to the grid. It works great.

 

We have replaced most of our petrol (gasoline) powered garden tools with good quality battery ones, mostly Ego brand. They have been fantastic. Walk-behind mower, chainsaw, pole pruning saw, line trimmer and brushcutter so far, all are really gutsy. The mower is amazing, I'm exhausted before the battery is - 45 min to an hour of hard, hilly, too-long grass cutting on a battery. The petrol brushcutter hasn't been used once since we got the battery one. Similar with the chainsaw - the petrol one has a longer blade and I have needed to use it once or twice in the 3 years + we have had the battery one. I certainly don't miss the temperamental 2 stroke motors, the heat and stink, the noise, the pulling the rope over and over, cursing the damn thing for not starting. Just insert a battery, squeeze the trigger and start work. We are on acreage and it all gets quite a workout. It all recharges off our home solar power system, so effectively costs nothing to run.

 

I have used some cheap battery garden tools and they have been gutless junk. Not a problem with the technology, just with the individual products.

 


Post# 1176653 , Reply# 14   3/31/2023 at 12:11 (392 days old) by bradfordwhite (central U.S.)        
#13

bradfordwhite's profile picture
That sounds awesome. You're like a living experiment.
Now with technology making things, smaller, stronger, more user friendly....
It's just a fab time to be living.



Post# 1176657 , Reply# 15   3/31/2023 at 12:42 (392 days old) by wayupnorth (On a lake between Bangor and Bar Harbor, Maine)        

wayupnorth's profile picture
I have had terrible luck with battery powered tools. Lithium batteries dont last me worth squat. I replaced my battery trimmer with a plug in and are very happy going backwards. Lithium powered dustbuster lasted me 2 years and would not hold a charge, same with cordless phones. If I cant plug it in, I dont want it.

Post# 1176658 , Reply# 16   3/31/2023 at 12:49 (392 days old) by kenwashesmonday (Carlstadt, NJ)        

My gas powered lawn mower is 33 years old and always starts on the first pull.  If it were electric, I wonder how many batteries it would have gone through over 33 years.

 

That said, I do have a battery powered trimmer, hedge clipper, and chain saw, and I think they're wonderful.  They are Worx brand and I'm very happy with them.



CLICK HERE TO GO TO kenwashesmonday's LINK

Post# 1176664 , Reply# 17   3/31/2023 at 14:16 (392 days old) by robbinsandmyers (Conn)        

robbinsandmyers's profile picture
I think the LAST thing this world needs is to produce more batteries because its going battery powered or hybrid or electric or whatever. We wont ever see a pure green solution in our lifetimes that is a much better option than internal combustion, natural gas, etc depending on application. I think once the day comes it will be something like a regenerative magnet that can create its own power source that will save the day and environment. Batteries are not the answer in their current form. However, a battery made of magnets that can produce power and recharge itself is. The technology is out there, its under our noses just like every other invention was. We just have to discover it.

Post# 1176667 , Reply# 18   3/31/2023 at 15:01 (392 days old) by henene4 (Heidenheim a.d. Brenz (Germany))        
there is no free energy

Geeze how often do I have to say that this month around here?
There will never be such a thing as a "self recharging battery".
It is fundamentally impossible in this universe and always will be.

There is nothing around that fact.




From production to junkyard, electric cars are more environmentally friendly TODAY with our current energy mix.

Batteries CAN be recycled - sure that has to happen but is technically feasible.

Internal combustion - combustion of any kind in general - can be eliminated 95% of cases today.
There are very few (but large) things where that isn't yet possible yet.



But current battery tech IS the future.
It WILL replace internal combustion engines over the next 30 years.

And free energy DOES NOT EXIST.


Post# 1176672 , Reply# 19   3/31/2023 at 17:20 (392 days old) by bradfordwhite (central U.S.)        

bradfordwhite's profile picture
NO, it's not happening in the future. It's NOW.

Petroleum vehicles and equipment are like the wringer washers of the 1960s or the candles of the 1920s here in the U.S., reel-to-reel tape players of the 1970s, or asbestos of the 1980s


In the 70s and 80s I remember these signs and they used standard flood lights, had a cord and a noisy gas generator at the base if there was no electric near by to plug into.

Now, they are brighter LED, silent, have a small solar panel, are reliable, have a battery and charge controller and probably even have a charging station where the workers can recharge their phones.



  View Full Size
Post# 1176673 , Reply# 20   3/31/2023 at 17:40 (392 days old) by qsd-dan (West)        

qsd-dan's profile picture

If batteries are the future, we need to get our fucking asses in gear with a 100% recycling rate or this will cause far more environmental damage than burning fuel. Currently, only 5% of lithium batteries are recycled vs a 90% recycle rate for lead acid batteries.

 

I'm not letting go of my hydrocarbon producing tools anytime soon.


Post# 1176674 , Reply# 21   3/31/2023 at 17:42 (392 days old) by petek (Ontari ari ari O )        

petek's profile picture
Still the problem is non standarized batteries between all these maker of garden and household tools and appliance. Heck even within a makers lineup there may be some models with a whole other battery type/shape. And then 4 or so years down the road you go to buy a replacement battery and it's NLA, this is super common. Whereas your plug in electric tool will probably last forever.

Post# 1176678 , Reply# 22   3/31/2023 at 18:05 (392 days old) by bradfordwhite (central U.S.)        
#21

bradfordwhite's profile picture
True.

If we don't have already there should be a board or group that standardizes this stuff.

The tool manufacturers do seem to be doing a "one battery for all" thing now. I was in the hardware store last month talking to the guy who works there and he also spent like $3000 a couple years ago to convert all his tools.
He says he wish he'd waited because he's got all these diff. chargers and batteries and the batteries can go NLA.

Now the diff. manufacturers have displays of like 90 different tools and they all use the same battery.

They need to take that several steps further and have it a universal battery for ALL tools, regardless of manufacturer
And that should be applied to all appliances regardless of manufacturer.

I mean one can always change how the battery technology works as long as the plug is still the same.

It's like a car battery. I can buy a 12 volt battery and it will fit just about any vehicle regardless of make or age and we know that that technology has changed.


Post# 1176700 , Reply# 23   3/31/2023 at 21:08 (391 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
I think some of you are missing the point.

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

In a nut shell. This is not about any of the cheap, rechargeable batteries currently on the market. This is about providing a solution to millions upon millions of polluting gas stoves being replaced gradually with battery backed electric stoves. Stoves that could operate with any of our 110volt outlets, thus saving millions of apartment buildings the huge cost of converting to 208volt outlets. 

 

These new storage batteries are just beginning to come out.  And with time, they will become far more affordable, reliable and durable enough to press into service in all stoves and eventually all major appliances. Think of it as a far cheaper, decentralized Power Wall. Conceivably these batteries would be able to operate your appliances for a few days in the event of a power failure. It goes without saying these batteries would be fully recyclable after a long service life.  A win-win in my book.

 


Post# 1176702 , Reply# 24   3/31/2023 at 21:17 (391 days old) by MattL (Flushing, MI)        

I might be helpful if you read the thread and comprehended the discussion.


Post# 1176723 , Reply# 25   3/31/2023 at 23:51 (391 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Indeed.

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

I'm afraid a few have not read the article I posted. C'est la vie.


Post# 1176729 , Reply# 26   4/1/2023 at 00:33 (391 days old) by tolivac (greenville nc)        

ALL of my yard care equipment is battery powered----LOVE IT!!!!!No more noisy ,stinking,high maintenance gas motors.I have EGO self propelled push mower-and an EGO 42" ZTR ride mower.These outperform gas mowers I had from the past.The idea of battery powered major appliances doesn't bode well.For those the 240V use is better.And now have an electric car-Toyota BZ4X SUV style car.Love it!!!Just an overnight charge from its 120V charge cord it does just fine.Can get 250 miles per full battery charge.This car does fine for me since I don't go on long car trips.

Post# 1176733 , Reply# 27   4/1/2023 at 00:45 (391 days old) by gizmo (Victoria, Australia)        
Guilty as charged.

I still haven't read those links in the first post (too many of them to bother with...) but I get the idea now - fit a stove top with built in battery, which can recharge slowly, at a rate that is supported by a single, standard power outlet, to run the short term high current needs of an electric cooktop. It sounds like a clever solution, though expensive.

 

Probably more useful in USA with 120V supply, less necessary here with 240v at all power outlets.

 

You could just buy a couple of plug in induction hotplates like these...

www.kmart.com.au/product/...

www.ikea.com/au/en/p/tillreda-po...

www.thegoodguys.com.au/tefal-exp...

 

Two of these side by side should be enough, and only cost from AU$150 to AU$300.

 

and when you aren't using them, you can put them away in a cupboard and get back some bench space.


Post# 1176736 , Reply# 28   4/1/2023 at 01:04 (391 days old) by robbinsandmyers (Conn)        
Reply #18

robbinsandmyers's profile picture
I know there is no such thing as free energy. And if you look at one of my posts in the past you'll remember I said battery technology will only go so far before the laws of physics makes it hit a brick wall and thats the end of that. Batteries will always be toxic to mine and recycle to the planet and are not the answer long term or short term. Bad enough we have as many as we have in the world without adding to them.

Post# 1176745 , Reply# 29   4/1/2023 at 05:12 (391 days old) by foraloysius (Leeuwarden, Friesland, the Netherlands)        

foraloysius's profile picture
Unlike gasoline and diesel engines, I don't think batteries are on the end of their development. I expect a new generation in the future that can store more energy in a smaller unit and hopefully will be environmentally friendly too.

That said there is a future perhaps for the combustion engine when a fuel can be found that has little to none impact on the environment. Some people talk about synthetic petrol, but I'm not too sure we want to go that way. What we surely not need is more petrol and diesel engines.


Post# 1176753 , Reply# 30   4/1/2023 at 09:24 (391 days old) by seedub (South Texas Hill Country)        
Reply #30

seedub's profile picture
Louis, I'm still holding out hope for hydrogen for both automobiles (FCEV) and for aircraft. Airbus has several prototypes and Rolls-Royce claims success in testing a hydrogen fueled jet engine last November. Volkswagen appears to have trashed the idea but Hyundai, Toyota and BMW are still investing heavily in the technology.

Post# 1176772 , Reply# 31   4/1/2023 at 14:31 (391 days old) by foraloysius (Leeuwarden, Friesland, the Netherlands)        

foraloysius's profile picture
Chris,

Hydrogen is a great solution for cars, trucks and aircrafts. But there are a few problems, the biggest is that a lot of energy is lost producing hydrogen. And then when the hydrogen has to be turned into electricity again, again a lot of energy is lost again. So because of that it's way better to use electricity directly than hydrogen whenever it is possible.




This post was last edited 04/01/2023 at 14:48
Post# 1176799 , Reply# 32   4/1/2023 at 18:10 (391 days old) by bradfordwhite (central U.S.)        

bradfordwhite's profile picture

Hydrogen relies on petroleum and is made by petroleum producers so.... of course, we can anticipate who is desperately trying to push this impractical, inefficient narrative.


Post# 1176821 , Reply# 33   4/1/2023 at 20:18 (390 days old) by SudsMaster (SF Bay Area, California)        

sudsmaster's profile picture

Another way to produce hydrogen gas is to run an electric current through water. This in turn will produce both oxygen and hydrogen gas. I remember doing this in a chemistry class years ago.



CLICK HERE TO GO TO SudsMaster's LINK

Post# 1176830 , Reply# 34   4/1/2023 at 21:30 (390 days old) by Adam-aussie-vac (Canberra ACT)        
Although my question is, instead of using something

To convert hydrogen into electricity, why can’t we just burn the hydrogen then all that comes out of the engine is just water

Post# 1176850 , Reply# 35   4/1/2023 at 23:41 (390 days old) by Maytag85 (Sean A806)        
Yard/garden tools

maytag85's profile picture
If people want a lawn mower that doesn’t pollute, make noise, needs maintenance that’s been around for decades, here it is. What is old is new again. Takes up less space too in the garage or shed.

  View Full Size
Post# 1176851 , Reply# 36   4/2/2023 at 00:06 (390 days old) by SudsMaster (SF Bay Area, California)        

sudsmaster's profile picture

Sean,

 

Well, a push reel mower is not maintenance-free. The blades need periodic sharpening, for example. But I agree is a lot more environmentally friendly than either a gas or an electric mower.

 

It IS more exercise, and takes longer to do the same plot of grass. Push reel mowers have pretty much gone out of style. However, I might have one here that would work just fine on my front yard. I just need to remember where I stashed it!

 

Tell the truth, for a small suburban front lawn, a gas mower uses perhaps a half gallon of gas. I have more important things to worry about, LOL.

 

 

 


Post# 1176854 , Reply# 37   4/2/2023 at 00:24 (390 days old) by Maytag85 (Sean A806)        
Reply #36

maytag85's profile picture
I mean the blades have to be sharpened from time to time but maintenance free in terms of no oil changes or having to make repairs or adjustments to the carburetor or points though small engine equipment usually uses a magneto for the ignition source. Indeed, reel mowers do take a bit more effort to use however there are models such as the Fiskars momentum that are a bit easier to use since they are geared differently than a older style of Scotts reel mower and aren’t much differently than a gas powered reel mower. Yes, reel mowers are old technology since they are the original lawn mower however, they have evolved with the times since most have hight adjustments and some even have a grass catcher that can be attached so there’s no grass clippings.

Post# 1176861 , Reply# 38   4/2/2023 at 02:29 (390 days old) by qsd-dan (West)        

qsd-dan's profile picture

for a small suburban front lawn, a gas mower uses perhaps a half gallon of gas.

 

I only used 2 gallons every 5-6 months from both the lawnmower and 4 stroke weed eater using them every single Thursday for both front and back lawns. Had to use fuel stabilizer every time I filled up or it would go stale before it was gone. How much pollution is 5-ish gallons a year worth fretting about? Would a battery style lawn mower last 26 years and counting or 23 years and counting for the weed eater?

 

BTW, I've never touched the carb on either one. Just oil changes, air filters, and sharpen the lawnmower blade once a year. I did have to replace the coil on the lawnmower when it was 17 years old. Worked when I put it away the week before, then no spark the next week while trying to start it (felt like it had zero compression). That was a strange failure.


Post# 1176922 , Reply# 39   4/2/2023 at 15:52 (390 days old) by givemehotwater (US)        
Out of curiosity

@Dan, what is the original manufacturer of that mower. If I see one at a estate sale or something, I definitely want to snap it up.



Post# 1176929 , Reply# 40   4/2/2023 at 16:32 (390 days old) by qsd-dan (West)        

qsd-dan's profile picture

Dan, what is the original manufacturer of that mower?

 

Nothing special, just a Craftsman mower with a 6.25 horsepower Tecumseh engine. I run the engine at half speed 99% of the time. I take exceptionally good care of my stuff and keep them out of the weather so it has lasted must longer than it would have with the average user. I'm sure a full blown Honda would have been much better but I can't complain and it was a fraction of the price.

 

The trick with the carbs lasting so long on both engines is that I add 1-2 ounces per gallon of Seafoam in the gas can, which is both a fuel stabilizer and a cleaner. Before Seafoam became famous via Youtube, it was about 2 dollars a can. I am surprised the diaphragms in the carbs have not become weak or damaged by MTBE and ethanol over the years. Maybe the Seafoam additive slowed that process down. Also, they are used every single week minus 4-6 weeks from December to early/mid January. Long periods of sitting is what causes problems.


Post# 1176939 , Reply# 41   4/2/2023 at 17:48 (390 days old) by robbinsandmyers (Conn)        

robbinsandmyers's profile picture

 " Tell the truth, for a small suburban front lawn, a gas mower uses perhaps a half gallon of gas."

 

What does your mower have for an engine? A 413 max wedge from a Hemi Dart? LOL

 

Most new residential mowers sip gas. And if you go back 50+ years the old reel mowers used even less fuel because they just putted along and didnt have to spin a blade at 3600 RPMs. The huge commercial mowers with 27Hp engines etc suck gas, but most people arent cutting their lawns with commercial machines. Ive got mowers from the FDR era that can cut the entire lawn 3 times on their small tanks of fuel.


Post# 1176949 , Reply# 42   4/2/2023 at 21:19 (389 days old) by bradfordwhite (central U.S.)        

bradfordwhite's profile picture
Generally quiet, no stinky air pollution with that muffler practically under your nose, plus very easy to fix and maintain.
They are generally lighter weight too so easier to maneuver.

Do they even make gas mowers anymore?


CLICK HERE TO GO TO bradfordwhite's LINK


  View Full Size
Post# 1176956 , Reply# 43   4/2/2023 at 22:11 (389 days old) by robbinsandmyers (Conn)        

robbinsandmyers's profile picture
Here lies the problem with that. The battery is half the price of the mower when it fails. I had a customer that owned a Troy-Built self propelled cordless mower that took two 40V batteries. It was $350.00 new 5 years ago. The batteries went and they were $150.00 each. Needless to say she tossed it in the trash. Not very green is it? battery powered lawn equipment is a fantasy these days. Wait till all the commercial guys that paid stupid money for all their Stihl cordless stuff with attachments have to start buying batteries. They'll go back to changing spark plugs in a heartbeat.

CLICK HERE TO GO TO robbinsandmyers's LINK


Post# 1176957 , Reply# 44   4/2/2023 at 22:17 (389 days old) by MattL (Flushing, MI)        

Having done a lot of research I'd stay away from that Atlas at HF.  By the time you add a battery and a charger you are in the price range of decent quality name brands.

 

I bought my Ego last spring and could not be happier with it.  double blades give me a beautiful cut.  Bought an Ego snow blower last fall but only got to use it once on 4" of snow, had an extended fall and no winter around here. Upside is I now have 3 batteries for the various tools, plan on adding a blower soon.


Post# 1176960 , Reply# 45   4/2/2023 at 22:38 (389 days old) by gizmo (Victoria, Australia)        

my oldest Ego battery is over 6 years old and still good as new.

Often the cheap machines have crap chargers and crap Battery Management System (BMS) which leads to short battery life.

 

It wasn't very green of robbinsandmyers' friend to toss a whole machine, when a new battery would have restored it to life.

An explosion-powered motor would probably have used that much worth of fuel and oil in that time. Cordless machines cost WAY less to operate than petrol powered ones. I am buying so much less petrol now that I have replaced my garden gadgets with battery electric ones, not to mention the improved reliability, lighter weight and easier starting.


Post# 1176978 , Reply# 46   4/3/2023 at 05:18 (389 days old) by givemehotwater (US)        
Somehow...

I think I'll manage to avoid being seduced by the tempting myths and siren songs of perceived savings, and "reliability".

At the end of the day, as I said before, I am a person who likes to go with "tried and true" technologies, instead of the latest fads. The idea of having to repurchase batteries every few years is just another scam in a long line of ever-worsening and substandard products.

Count me out of the battery revolution for lawncare. I already hate trying to figure out the battery situation for my Dewalt Drill.

I also have very grave concerns about the original post, involving batteries and a Oven or Range. I feel like they could prove to be fire hazards or dangerous due to the high-heat and rough environment. I'd much rather have a traditional Gas or Electric Range.


Post# 1177190 , Reply# 47   4/4/2023 at 21:16 (387 days old) by bradfordwhite (central U.S.)        

bradfordwhite's profile picture

The secret to keeping battery tools
-THAT DON'T have a plug in to recharge and require the battery be removed and attached to or inserted into a charger is:

Don't leave the battery in the tool when not in use.

I learned this the hard way about 20 years ago and I TOO was turned off for a while by battery tools.
The problem with leaving a battery in a tool is that it can have a minor short in the switch or some other minor issue that isn't obvious that will slowly trickle juice from the battery until it's DEAD.

 

Now battery operated tools I have:

The B&D $50 cordless drill I bought NEW at Walmart in 2017

 

The like new B&D leaf blower, that uses the same batteries as the drill, I bought at at rummage sale for $5

 

A like new Walmart recip saw I bought for $22 from a pawn shop in 2019

 

A never used B&D string trimmer I bought at a thrift store in 2019 for $7 and had to buy a pair of new batteries from Ebay for $32 total

 

They all still work BECAUSE I remove the batteries when not in use and make sure they are recharged right after using them

 

It's pretty easy to slide the battery off the tool and slide the the charger onto it.   Let it sit over night and remove the charger the next day.  

 

----

 

Years ago I bought a couple of gas Lawnboy lawnmowers and a Stihl chainsaw.  What a stinky mess.  You always got petroleum fumes all over your because the muffler was literally under your nose.  They needed oil and gas and filters and plugs.  You could use the machine if it had been on it's side.  And the performance quickly died off.  They vibrate themselves to the point of literally bolts falling off and parts rattling.  Plus that vibration goes right up your arm.   And of course the NOISE.  You had to wear hearing protection.

Just awful.  

That Lawnboy Silver I bought new from Sears for about $500 in 1999 was junk by 2002 and I just left it behind with a house I sold then.  I was always really good about blade changed, changing the oil, changing the filter and plug.

I'm glad that stinky crap is over.  It served us but it's time is gone.  We move on to better things.

 

 

 

 


Post# 1177220 , Reply# 48   4/5/2023 at 08:38 (387 days old) by DaveAMKrayoGuy (Oak Park, MI)        

daveamkrayoguy's profile picture
Remember Nikola Tesla, he wanted to invent a generator which could efficiently and effectively produce voulme amints of electricity using the same principles as battery power, and to this day it is a shame it was never implemented...

Also why is it that a battery cannot be eternally charged and we have to concern ourselves with landfills overfilled with discarded power cells?

Seems as though if we were to rediscover his formula and theory and put it all out in actual practice, this thing with renewable electric-based power would solve every one of life's problems once and for all, except many like me prefer some things to still run on gas!


-- Dave


Post# 1177247 , Reply# 49   4/5/2023 at 20:16 (386 days old) by bradfordwhite (central U.S.)        

bradfordwhite's profile picture
Batteries are pretty simple and recyclable. I wouldn't worry about recycling them. As long as you treat them right they will last.

Worst case scenario, a battery left to degrade outside will devolve back into it's milled ingredients.


Post# 1177269 , Reply# 50   4/5/2023 at 22:31 (386 days old) by qsd-dan (West)        

qsd-dan's profile picture

Batteries are pretty simple and recyclable.
Their recyclability depends on the materials used. As I have mentioned, only 5% of lithium batteries are currently being recycled as their no standard put in place. It's all mined using slave labor and the high amounts of lithium show up in their bloodstream, causing many permanent health issues. Until long life batteries come along that are 100% recyclable, having little effect on the environment during the extraction process NOT carried out with slave labor, I'll pass.

Post# 1177286 , Reply# 51   4/5/2023 at 23:07 (386 days old) by bradfordwhite (central U.S.)        

bradfordwhite's profile picture
"Until long life batteries come along that are 100% recyclable, having little effect on the environment during the extraction process NOT carried out with slave labor, I'll pass."

But you're OK with all the damages that petroleum does, and has done, including the spills that have polluted many an ocean and it's wildlife, climate change and the increasingly severe weather that is doing incredible and expensive amounts of damages both in the U.S. and abroad, and of course the air and noise pollution that affects many communities.

Fortunately, there are those who don't put up an unrealistic tantrum DEMANDING that a product be absolutely perfect before they give the concept the nod of approval.

Computers in the 1990s, Internet access in the late 90s, and cel phones in the 2000s, and flat screen TVS and smart phones weren't perfect at the start. Now we can't live without them and the improvements they've made for society are immeasurable. People saw the potential early on and bought just as there are those who are enjoying their new electric cars and gas appliances now.




Post# 1177288 , Reply# 52   4/5/2023 at 23:12 (386 days old) by Maytag85 (Sean A806)        

maytag85's profile picture
I hate to take this off the tracks, but we’d be better off building more nuclear power plants that generate clean carbon free power. Many of the resources to solve our energy needs along with reducing pollution have been at our disposal for quite some time but everyone keeps on falling for the propaganda and such. If there were more nuclear power plants in existence to the point where there would be a surplus of electricity, we’d be able to do a lot more to the point where it would be unimaginable such as having the ability to electrify more homes, reduce energy costs, be more prosperous, etc.

Post# 1177292 , Reply# 53   4/5/2023 at 23:27 (386 days old) by bradfordwhite (central U.S.)        

bradfordwhite's profile picture
No, we aren't allowing the building of anymore major polluter nuclear power plants.

With energy efficiency such as LED bulbs and other ways of conserving usage, the total usage in the U.S. plateaued in 2010.

The addition of CLEAN GREEN energy such as wind and solar panels, and battery load management has added to the grid.

This is allowing the greater use of electric vehicles without much impact.

The trolls pushing nuclear are a handful of ignorant people who are devoid of the facts and dangers and only want to get in on contracting hoping to charge our government BILLIONS of $ for their hugely flawed construction projects.


Post# 1177295 , Reply# 54   4/6/2023 at 01:23 (386 days old) by Maytag85 (Sean A806)        

maytag85's profile picture
“No, we aren’t allowing the building of anymore major polluter nuclear power plants”

Huh, the only things things nuclear power plants generate is steam which is WATER VAPOR.

“With energy efficiency such as LED bulbs and other ways of conserving usage, the total usage in the U.S. plateaued in 2010”

Hmm, me thinks energy consumption has gone up since 2010 since most college and high school students around that time have moved out of their parents’ home and have since bought their own home and started a family.

“The addition of CLEAN GREEN energy such as wind and solar panels, and battery load management.

You don’t realize what it takes to make solar panels, most of the raw materials that are required to make come from places like China which don’t have much in the way of human rights and usually slave labor is used like Dan mentioned.

“This is allowing the greater use of electric vehicles without much impact”

More would be in use is we had a surplus of electricity but people like you who fall for the propaganda that nuclear is bad just create a blockade from getting anything done.

“The trolls pushing nuclear are a harmful of ignorant people who are devoid of the facts and dangers and only want to get in on contracting hoping to charge our government BILLIONS of $ for their hugely flawed construction projects”

I am NOT a troll, just trying to find a practical solution that everyone is on board with and doesn’t have to change everything around them and go through such hoops. You are unfortunately one of those ignorant people, we had resources for DECADES to reduce pollution but yet you fall for the propaganda which is why we are in the situation we are in. Again, if we had a surplus of electricity from nuclear power, the sky would be the limit and would be able to do a lot more, more than we could ever dream of.


Post# 1177302 , Reply# 55   4/6/2023 at 06:25 (386 days old) by retro-man (- boston,ma)        
Wind Power

A number of years ago there was a man who invented a wind generator. This was a small unit that looked like a turbo for a large diesel engine. This was mounted on a pole installed near the house. It was almost silent while working.This could rotate to which ever way the wind was blowing. There was also screens attached to it to keep wild life out. At the bottom of the pole was a generator, which in turn supplied storage batteries. Which in turn provided power to the house. Incredible invention. Every house would have been able to have one. I guess some major oil company bought the patent to this and covered it up so no one could enjoy free power. There it technology out there presently to take care of our power needs, but big $ takes over and leaves us in the dark.

Jon


Post# 1177303 , Reply# 56   4/6/2023 at 06:42 (386 days old) by chetlaham (United States)        

chetlaham's profile picture

Sean, for the sake of your sanity bear in mind a certain percentage of the population resorts to personal attacks when presented with irrefutable information. That does not mean you are flawed or the problem, on the contrary, the answer rests with you.

 

 

With that said I'll simply say that you are not definitely not a troll. You are 100% correct in everything you've said. 


Post# 1177305 , Reply# 57   4/6/2023 at 07:33 (386 days old) by foraloysius (Leeuwarden, Friesland, the Netherlands)        

foraloysius's profile picture
"Huh, the only things things nuclear power plants generate is steam which is WATER VAPOR."

I believe Sean that you forgot about the nuclear waste. That is the biggest problem with nuclear plants.

Besides that, a lot of nuclear plants have problems with cooling water. It's important that the temperature of it doesn't become too warm, otherwise it leads to damage in the body of water where it's being drained into.


Post# 1177307 , Reply# 58   4/6/2023 at 07:48 (386 days old) by DaveAMKrayoGuy (Oak Park, MI)        

daveamkrayoguy's profile picture

Yes, NUCLEAR WASTE contributes to:

 

--The body of water which glows and gives its inhabitants extra eyes, limbs, openings and other appendages...

 

 

 

-- Dave


Post# 1177310 , Reply# 59   4/6/2023 at 09:06 (386 days old) by foraloysius (Leeuwarden, Friesland, the Netherlands)        

foraloysius's profile picture
If the water is too warm, plants, fish and other creatures living in that water will die.

Post# 1177311 , Reply# 60   4/6/2023 at 09:25 (386 days old) by gizmo (Victoria, Australia)        
You don’t realize what it takes to make solar panels,

"You don’t realize what it takes to make solar panels, most of the raw materials that are required to make come from places like China which don’t have much in the way of human rights and usually slave labor is used like Dan mentioned."

 

Actually solar panels use silicone as their main active component. Plus glass for covers and aluminium (aluminum) for frames.

Silicone is made from sand - it's abundant all over the world. Aluminium is made from bauxite - and Australia is the world's largest supplier of bauxite, a country with a human rights record at least as good as the USA. (arguably better.)

 

 


Post# 1177320 , Reply# 61   4/6/2023 at 12:57 (386 days old) by Maytag85 (Sean A806)        
Reply #57

maytag85's profile picture
Forgot about that, but even then that’s minuscule compared to the amount of carbon that’s released into the atmosphere each year. Even more minuscule when nuclear power plants only need refueling every few years as opposed to coal and natural gas plants that need to be refueled every second of everyday, every day of every week, every week of every month, every month of every year.

Post# 1177325 , Reply# 62   4/6/2023 at 14:10 (386 days old) by henene4 (Heidenheim a.d. Brenz (Germany))        
Nuclear power is a difficult matter to discuss

Even including all radiation related accidents, it is a matter of fact that the mortality rate per unit of energy of nuclear is among one of the lowest.

Per kWh, it is relatively green even with the fuel cycle emissions included.

Nuclear power plants are some of the most reliable machines ever built.




Then, in theory, we can make even current pressurised water reactor tech much less problematic.

If you were to do things like fuel recycling, separation etc., you could get a years high level nuclear waste for one power plant into the single metric ton range.
Which sounds like a lot, but given that that is about a percent of the actual core material, and given how much energy you get from that, that is minute.




But, nuclear power is facing a lot of issues.

There is currently one single final storage facility for high level nuclear waste ob the entire planet.
And we need like at least ten times as many.

There has been no meaningful research into nuclear fuel recycling.
The big fear is nuclear proliferation, the uncontrolled spread of technology needed to create nuclear weapons.
Which fuel recycling very much is.
But without it, instead of splitting off the ton of stuff that is REALLY nasty and storing that in those facilities we have to store ALL of the nuclear fuel that ever is used in any nuclear power plant as "deadly in minutes for about a thousand years".
That multiplies the final storage situation with a hundred.
So we either need significantly more final storage sites - of which we have, as said, one - OR we need a few of these storage sites and a way more stable political climate.


And then, the thing I know most about probably, the engineering side of things.
You design a machine for a certain lifetime. You usually design it with a certain buffer to that design lifetime.
But almost all nuclear power plants online right now are very much at the end of their lifetime.
And even though the designs are out there for new ones - we haven't really build many in the past few decades.
It's a long and expensive process to even get started on that project, and even if you manage to build it, it will be INCREDIBLY expensive and might come online in a decade?




Nuclear power could be a reasonably safe stop gap solution for the next 40 years.

If people would be less NIMBI-ish.
If governments would try to not show of in self interest and actually care about educating their population and giving them the best -not themselves.
Then we would have to get a lot of projects up and going very quickly, but can under no circumstances drop the standards on any of them, cause, you know, Chernobyl, Fukushima etc.
And maybe have a solution online in 10 years - and would have to work on its replacement right away.




Saying in total:
That could have been a very good solution, in a better timeline than this one, started a decade ago.

In this timeline, it is very unlikely it will make any sense and get anywhere and that we are probably better off just going with the proper solution right away and skipping that stop gap solution.


Post# 1177337 , Reply# 63   4/6/2023 at 16:03 (386 days old) by chetlaham (United States)        
At the end of their lifetime

chetlaham's profile picture

almost all nuclear power plants online right now are very much at the end of their lifetime.

 

 

Indeed, which is why hundreds of new nuclear plants should have been built over the last 30 years while 95% of the current plants should have been closed down over the last 15. Why? So we don't have more avoidable black eyes like this:

 

 




 

I'm only posting this because I know the opponents will eventually use it against me as indisputable evidence that all nuclear power is dangerous when in reality a new designs simply don't do this. Nuclear's only down fall is being stuck in the 60s thanks to long standing public fear holding it back.


Post# 1177350 , Reply# 64   4/6/2023 at 19:49 (385 days old) by bradfordwhite (central U.S.)        
#57

bradfordwhite's profile picture

Louis, yes

"I believe Sean that you forgot about the nuclear waste. That is the biggest problem with nuclear plants."

The trolls ALWAYS conveniently forget about the tiny tiny little problem of the barrels and barrels of green oozing waste that as of yet- NO ONE wants in their backyard.


Even the trolls for some REASON, don't want the waste near them. hmmmm. Don't know if it's the fact that it causes significant death via poisoning in very short period and lasts 48,000 years. .... of if they just don't like the yucky glowing green part.

Whatever.

Extremely harmful to human life.

They won't be built.

Yes, lots of people are genuinely scared and won't tolerated money being wasted on this crap.
And the desperate infiltrating of Wikipedia and other sources to spread blatant lies by the trolls who are desperate to get tax payer funds isn't going unseen.

A nuclear plant BEHEMOTH cement cave costs BILLIONS of $$ and takes 10+ years.  

A Solar plant uses NO cement, is very easy to build in a few months and doesn't cost much and heaven forbid something bad happens....nothing bad happens.

There is no environmental damage. There is no waste when a solar panel operates. They are so popular, solar panels are being installed directly on rooves. Creating Electric right where most of it's used. Now that's efficient.

 

Certainly can't do that with nuclear, or coal, or NG power plants.

 

------

However, This post is about Battery operated appliances. Let's pay respect to the original posters theme and stay on subject.

If certain individuals want to create a new thread about nuclear _____ stuff,  they need to please do that.




This post was last edited 04/06/2023 at 20:18
Post# 1177379 , Reply# 65   4/6/2023 at 22:12 (385 days old) by SudsMaster (SF Bay Area, California)        

sudsmaster's profile picture

It's nothing short of ridiculous to claim that a discussion of replacing gas tools with electric tools cannot also include the concerns about the origin of the electric power for those tools.

 

And for that kind of discussion nuclear power is extremely appropriate. As is solar power, electricity generated by water (as in dams), wind power, etc etc etc.

 

To stick to one solution is not only short sighted but invites some sort of disaster down the road.

 

 


Post# 1177388 , Reply# 66   4/7/2023 at 00:27 (385 days old) by robbinsandmyers (Conn)        

robbinsandmyers's profile picture
From the U.S. Energy Information Adminstration

" Although significant renewable capacity has been added in the past decade, differences in the amount of electricity that different types of power plants can produce mean that wind and solar made up about 17% of the country’s utility-scale capacity in 2021 but produced only 12% of our electricity. "

Wind and solar contribute so little so far they arent even a contender yet for dominance. Seems the more I look at the graph on that page and see how coal, natural gas are used less and less it makes sense why my energy costs are going higher each year with all these bright ideas. While the other half of the world pollutes like its still 1935. And as far as nuclear F THAT. We had one Fukushima and one Chernobyl and that was enough. And they arent over yet and wont be on our lifetimes.


CLICK HERE TO GO TO robbinsandmyers's LINK


Post# 1177389 , Reply# 67   4/7/2023 at 00:47 (385 days old) by petek (Ontari ari ari O )        
Small Modular Reactors

petek's profile picture
Ontario which gets more than 50% of it's power from nuclear is moving ahead on the first small modular reactors. www.ontario.ca/page/small...

CLICK HERE TO GO TO petek's LINK


Post# 1177425 , Reply# 68   4/7/2023 at 12:35 (385 days old) by bradfordwhite (central U.S.)        
Portable battery op Frig/Freezer

bradfordwhite's profile picture
I'm wondering if it's using a compressor.

Charge your batteries during the day using a simple 12 volt solar panel for FREE.


CLICK HERE TO GO TO bradfordwhite's LINK


  View Full Size
Post# 1177493 , Reply# 69   4/7/2023 at 22:40 (384 days old) by bradfordwhite (central U.S.)        
Power to Cut down a tree

bradfordwhite's profile picture
.





Post# 1200510 , Reply# 70   2/29/2024 at 16:19 by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Let's try this again.

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Induction ovens with big batteries solve lots of problems

 



CLICK HERE TO GO TO Ultramatic's LINK

  View Full Size
Post# 1200511 , Reply# 71   2/29/2024 at 16:43 by qsd-dan (West)        

qsd-dan's profile picture
Lots of questions...

How much does the battery setup add to the cost of the range?

What is the life expectancy of the battery?

What is the cost of the battery replacement?

How easy is the replacement process?

How much extra complexity is it adding to the overall design?

How reliably is the design?


This smells like an expensive gimmick, both upfront and later down the road.


Post# 1200517 , Reply# 72   2/29/2024 at 18:42 by combo52 (50 Year Repair Tech Beltsville,Md)        
Electric ranges with battery back up

combo52's profile picture
First of all, there is no such thing as an induction oven. This is a common misconception that people keep asking me about. There are ranges with ovens that have an induction top on them but there’s no such thing as an induction oven.

I’m not sure how popular these will become, but they make a lot of sense. I don’t think the problems would be very significant with them, it just depends on your home and situations you’re trying to solve.

I do see these battery. Backup ranges has been a clever way to get rid of gas in apartment buildings that don’t have enough electrical capacity, of course this will work just as well with an electric range that has resistance burners on top resistance burners are 80% efficient induction is about 90% efficient there’s not that much difference

I love the idea of using it to back up and operate things like you refrigerator etc. if there’s a power outage the batteries in these ranges hood operate a refrigerator for weeks if there was an emergency or power outage.

John


Post# 1200522 , Reply# 73   2/29/2024 at 21:13 by GELaundry4ever (Nacogdoches, TX, USA)        
battery powered appliances

Seriously, make it make sense. How will our washers, dryers and dishwashers be able to handle the freight without dying? When they run on normal electricity, they do just fine for me. Oh boy, I see problems down the road.

Post# 1200575 , Reply# 74   3/1/2024 at 17:41 by Novum (Ireland)        

That isn’t very practical tbh. I think you’re going to start seeing a lot more grid based battery storage. Home battery storage for solar is somewhat practical, but it’s also a big cost and a lot of maintenance. When they’re new they’re great, but you’re going to have a lot of clunky old battery systems in 20 years time.

The reason that grids and distribution of power developed in the first place was to make it a utility that we don’t have to think about.

I could see a lot of scope for people just having solar panels and selling the excess back into the grid, to be used or stored.

Battery powered dishwashers, washing machines and cooking appliances isn’t practical and it creates a massive amount of local maintenance, complicated systems in every appliance, bulk and weight and even fire hazard.

These stories aren’t how green energy is going work for most people, other than maybe off grid houses and hobbyists / enthusiasts.

The rest of us expect things to just work and not to have to think about the nuts and bolts of the power grid every time we make a coffee.


Post# 1200579 , Reply# 75   3/1/2024 at 18:35 by GELaundry4ever (Nacogdoches, TX, USA)        
conspiracy

I think batter powered appliances is just another conspiracy.

Post# 1200597 , Reply# 76   3/2/2024 at 05:34 by chetlaham (United States)        

chetlaham's profile picture

Battery powered appliances are but one of many examples of solar, wind and hydro resulting in complexity and dangers on orders of magnitude greater than any other means of energy production. About the only places batteries make sense are in phones, computers, emergency lights, and medical devices to ride through the interruption of normal power before transferring to emergency power, to save work data before shutting down, or to facilitate moving the device or person to another location.

 

Any other application is too impractical. Maybe with ultra capacitors but I'm still waiting.


Post# 1200675 , Reply# 77   3/3/2024 at 09:22 by combo52 (50 Year Repair Tech Beltsville,Md)        
Wow, don’t tell the owners of

combo52's profile picture
The over 26 million electric cars in use around the world,

I guess I’ve been doing it all wrong with all my electric power tools, my lawnmower, chainsaw, string, trimmers, leaf blowers, etc. etc.

They sure are a lot safer than the gasoline powered lawn tools I used to use.

My rooftop solar panels are running my house beautifully today on a sunny afternoon, keeping all my food cold, frozen food in the freezers, dishwasher is humming along about to go down and do laundry, and in spite of doing all this, I will be sending about 30 kW back into the grid to help my neighbors Keep their lights on today.

John


Post# 1200680 , Reply# 78   3/3/2024 at 11:30 by kb0nes (Burnsville, MN)        

kb0nes's profile picture
This sure strikes me as a solution looking for a problem. Really in the grand scheme of things how many homes aren't wired for 240v AC service?? Yes one may have to run a new line to the kitchen and that will cost money, but I'd wager less than the additional costs of putting a big battery in the appliance. You also make the appliance less efficient because of charge/discharge conversion efficiency losses. I'll go out on a limb and say this idea never gains any traction.

The idea of power backup makes a little sense, but just spend the money backing up the whole house perhaps. Adding a battery/inverter to the home is good security, can allow for off peak energy shifting and integration of renewable sources too.


Post# 1200684 , Reply# 79   3/3/2024 at 13:20 by combo52 (50 Year Repair Tech Beltsville,Md)        
Battery back up for electric ranges

combo52's profile picture
I agree I don’t think this is gonna be a popular option, especially with the high-end ranges they’re talking about in the article.

But I could see a fairly significant market to retrofit old apartments in DC, New York, etc. etc. there are a lot of old buildings that are very under wired and cannot easily install 240 V lines and a lot of these buildings are desperate to get rid of the gas ranges because of the gas leaks that they’re constantly dealing with in the old plumbing. I know of an apartment building in a nice part of downtown DC senior Dupont Circle where they have several apartments they can’t rent because the line that snakes all the way from the basement to the gas stove has a leak in it somewhere, and they’ve had to shut off the line, this type of stove would make the apartment rentable again easily.

Usually the only thing gas in the apartments is the gas range and the electrical panels have usually been upgraded slightly to where they could easily run This range, they’ve been upgraded to run window, air, conditioners and microwave, ovens, etc.

With some power company or governmental incentives a basic electric range With battery back up, might prove quite advantageous for some of these buildings but I agree it’s not gonna become a common place thing. Nice kitchen throughout the country.

There are almost no single-family homes that cannot easily have a 240 V line run for the range. It will soon be simple just to divert the 240 V line for the electric dryer And plug in a 120 V heat pump dryer in anyway.

John


Post# 1200690 , Reply# 80   3/3/2024 at 14:16 by foraloysius (Leeuwarden, Friesland, the Netherlands)        

foraloysius's profile picture
Back up batteries for the home already are a thing here. Even Ikea sells them. Ikea’s are 3758 euro for 5kWh. They have models up to 30 kWh. Other brands are Tesla, LG, Huawei, Solarwatt, Solar Edge and Green Rock. The last one is a salt water battery.

If you have a lot of money to spend you can even get a 1000 kWh one for 1 Million Euros.

I guess our 230 Volts system is a big advantage.


Post# 1200704 , Reply# 81   3/3/2024 at 23:22 by tolivac (greenville nc)        

I no longer have the electric car-traded it in to a hybrid.Like that better.I do still use battery tools,ride mower and push mower.EGO Tools-DeWalt and Milwaukee.All kitchen appliances still corded.


Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

The Discuss-o-Mat has stopped, buzzer is sounding!!!
If you would like to reply to this thread please log-in...

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy