|
Thread Number: 94139
/ Tag: Classified Ad Finds
Heads Up! Whirlpool Wringer Washer |
[Down to Last] |  |
Post# 1188316 8/23/2023 at 18:27 (249 days old) by Launderess  (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage) |
||
 | ||
|
|
Post# 1188327 , Reply# 1 8/23/2023 at 19:30 (249 days old) by JustJunque (Western MA) |
||
 | ||
|
Post# 1188328 , Reply# 2 8/23/2023 at 19:30 (249 days old) by combo52 (50 Year Repair Tech Beltsville,Md) |
||
1969 world pool, wringer washer | ||
|
Post# 1188330 , Reply# 3 8/23/2023 at 19:50 (249 days old) by Launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage) |
||
|
Before finally landing our Maytag wringer really considered Whirlpool. A few really nice low use machines cropped up in our neck of the woods and was that tempted.
Went with Maytag on feeling that spares (especially NOS) would be far easier to find. Time seems to have borne this out as while one has seen tons of NOS Maytag wringer parts those for WP/Kenmore and even SQ are not so easily sourced. | ||
|
Post# 1188337 , Reply# 4 8/23/2023 at 20:19 (249 days old) by combo52 (50 Year Repair Tech Beltsville,Md) |
||
|
Reply number three
Hi laundress, I would definitely agree with your reasoning it would be easier to own an Maytag wringer washer today it was a little bit more durable product than the other brands sold in the US.
I would rate the whirlpool in the Speed Queen‘s about equal in durability. Maytag only ever made three products that were superior in durability in my opinion, the wringer washer, their automatic washer, and their garbage disposal. Unfortunately, in all three of these products, durability came with poorer performance, there’s always a Trade off and compromises in life. John | ||
|
Post# 1188357 , Reply# 5 8/24/2023 at 01:08 (248 days old) by DADoES (TX, U.S. of A.) |
||
 | ||
| Forum Index: |
| Other Forums: |
|
|
|
|
|
Comes to the Rescue!
