Thread Number: 36869
Can Anybody Date this Kenmore Washer? |
[Down to Last] |
|
Post# 548440 , Reply# 1   10/10/2011 at 08:17 (4,582 days old) by freshwater ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Here's another picture ... |
Post# 548441 , Reply# 2   10/10/2011 at 08:26 (4,582 days old) by freshwater ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
The manual and parts list ... |
Post# 548443 , Reply# 3   10/10/2011 at 08:50 (4,582 days old) by jaxsunst ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
1965, on a kenmore the year is the first two digits of the model number. |
Post# 548447 , Reply# 4   10/10/2011 at 08:56 (4,582 days old) by yogitunes (New Jersey)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 548449 , Reply# 5   10/10/2011 at 08:56 (4,582 days old) by freshwater ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
THANKS FOR THE INFO!!!! =D |
Post# 548450 , Reply# 6   10/10/2011 at 08:59 (4,582 days old) by yogitunes (New Jersey)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 548455 , Reply# 7   10/10/2011 at 09:05 (4,582 days old) by freshwater ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Thanks for the link. That's a great resource! |
Post# 548464 , Reply# 8   10/10/2011 at 10:17 (4,581 days old) by KenmoreGuy64 (Charlotte, NC)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
That is indeed a 1965 model. If you give us the serial number off the back, we can tell you the year and week it was manufactured.
This was a prolific model. A late 1966 build date would not surprise me. Here is my machine, a slightly later version but still a 110.651471x (x = something, I can't remember. The higher that number, the more model revisions there were). Mine was built in early 1968 and is the final version before Sears finally replaced the model. I'm glad you rescued this! Gordon |
Post# 548468 , Reply# 9   10/10/2011 at 10:40 (4,581 days old) by macboy91si (Frankfort, KY)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 548487 , Reply# 11   10/10/2011 at 12:14 (4,581 days old) by revvinkevin (Tinseltown - Shakey Town - La-La Land)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 548489 , Reply# 12   10/10/2011 at 12:26 (4,581 days old) by 76SpeedQueen (Orleans County Ny)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 548497 , Reply# 14   10/10/2011 at 13:08 (4,581 days old) by freshwater ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Another ... |
Post# 548509 , Reply# 15   10/10/2011 at 13:33 (4,581 days old) by KenmoreGuy64 (Charlotte, NC)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Rhonda -
Thanks for the info. update. You said: The official digits from the back of the washer are: Model # - 110.6514712C00 Serial # - 12157J65C I am betting that the serial 12157J65C is actually 12157J650. If so, that would be production in St. Joe Michigan (J) in the 50th week of 1966. That translates into mid December, 1966 which agrees perfectly with the date on your literature. Other than a little bit of cosmetic difference, my machine does not have the filtering light. It has the later agitator in gold with the gold scrubber cap. In case you are ever shopping for parts, the C00 in your model number is not really part of the official model number. I'm not sure why Sears did that, other than to denote color (C for Coppertone), but the full model is 110.6514712. I think mine is 110.6514715. We're looking forward to your test results! Gordon |
Post# 548517 , Reply# 17   10/10/2011 at 14:34 (4,581 days old) by revvinkevin (Tinseltown - Shakey Town - La-La Land)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Hi Rhonda,
As far as I know, no. You'll just have to check back to see if anyone has replied. If you do choose to go for the membership upgrade (only $12 for the year, less for less then a year), there are easier ways to tell if a thread has been replied to or not.
If you have not seen the info on what the upgrade gives you, click the link below.
Kevin CLICK HERE TO GO TO revvinkevin's LINK |
Post# 548548 , Reply# 18   10/10/2011 at 17:49 (4,581 days old) by LordKenmore (The Laundry Room)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 548551 , Reply# 19   10/10/2011 at 18:22 (4,581 days old) by westingman123 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Oooooh, Rhonda! You're a natural--those "money shots" were perfect. That's a fine looking machine. Welcome. I think you'll find these guys and gals are the BEST! Keith |
Post# 548586 , Reply# 20   10/10/2011 at 21:11 (4,581 days old) by pdub (Portland, Oregon)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 548620 , Reply# 21   10/10/2011 at 23:26 (4,581 days old) by KenmoreGuy64 (Charlotte, NC)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
This model is at least 3/4 up the line, but it is not second to the Lady. This is considered (by model number anyway) a 70 series machine. There seems to have been one alphabet and one standard 70-series each year. There would have been at least one possibly two 80/800 series machine(s) before the Lady K as well.
As far as 1965s go, I have both the 65 Lady K and the '65 800. The 800 is a little easier to use as it has five manually selectable temps. There may have been an alphabet 800 that year too, I'm not completely sure. There are always hold-over models from previous years too... Sometimes all too complicated. Sears wasn't selling a line of cars, just washers. As to the white baskets, in the 1960s, they seemed to be used in 70-series models and up. By the seventies, I think they were LK only (1971-1975). By the late 70s tubs were blue/gray speckled with white, or beige speckled with white, the beige being in the fancier machines. I am not aware of any pure white until the 1983 line came out with the double coated white in several models including the LK. Gordon |
Post# 548643 , Reply# 23   10/11/2011 at 06:14 (4,581 days old) by freshwater ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Who knew there was so much to learn about a washing machine! I just hope I can figure out how to operate it ... O_o ha Thanks again, everybody! |
Post# 548715 , Reply# 24   10/11/2011 at 17:31 (4,580 days old) by pdub (Portland, Oregon)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 548785 , Reply# 25   10/11/2011 at 21:06 (4,580 days old) by washerlover (The Big Island, Hawai’i)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
|
Post# 548824 , Reply# 26   10/12/2011 at 01:44 (4,580 days old) by DaveAMKrayoGuy (Oak Park, MI)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
|
Post# 548892 , Reply# 27   10/12/2011 at 10:18 (4,579 days old) by freshwater ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
@Dave ~ HAHAHAHAHA! ^________^ I've been waiting for that ... |
Post# 549168 , Reply# 28   10/13/2011 at 17:52 (4,578 days old) by DaveAMKrayoGuy (Oak Park, MI)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|